Another contender for the Best S1 Episode Throne, this episode was one of the most thorough and whole episodes I can remember. From the first scene, it was built up towards the conclusion, where women and half-demons alike proved their true mettle, focusing on what makes a hero.
The dialogue was awesome, always circling around the substance of the story. The different parts of it were connected seamlessly, as if they were the paragraphs of a perfectly written text, the endig of each leading up to the next.
The pathos part of it was also immensely well performed, and I had tears running down my cheeks from Cordelia and Doyle’s conversation about him being a vampire, until well after the Mutant Zombie had uttered its “Grrr. Argh.” The scene where Angel and Cordelia watches Doyle’s take at being an actor, ending with Doyle’s nervous “That’s it? Am I done?” further increased this trickle of salty water on my face.
When, additionally, there’s a parallel theme where Whedon and the crew kick at Nazis and other racists and bigots… well, suffice to say I was nearly overwhelmed.
Finally, I find it worth mentioning Cordelia’s vision of a commercial in the beginning, where she lists people whom she’d like to do the voice-overs of the Angel Investigation commercial. Included in this list is “one of the cheaper Baldwins” — I immedeately thought “ADAM!” ![]()

Posts
I think that the most brilliant part of this episode might be how they fool you into thinking its a normal, stand-alone monster-of-the-week kind of episode, and then suddenly hit you with a character-death of such proportions and importance it is unequalled by anything up until Darla’s final death in the middle of season 3 - and even that is a whole other type of character-death. Actually, I’d dare say a character death of Doyle’s proportions doesn’t occur again until 92 episodes later, in a little thing called “You’re Welcome”. And, among other things, what happens in “You’re Welcome”? Angel and Cordelia watches Doyle’s take at being an actor.
This series just get more beautiful the more I think about it.
12. October 2006 @ 14:04 ( Permalink )
Wow. That’s what I call continuity. No wonder obsessive-perfectionists like you love the series.
12. October 2006 @ 22:07 ( Permalink )
The weird part is, what I mentioned above is just yet another small magnificent detail I discover by commenting other people’s statements on the series or the invididual episodes. I’ve never actually thought about these things before. XD
12. October 2006 @ 22:16 ( Permalink )
By the way, regarding my arcs-list, would you say the episode following this one belongs to the initial “Doyle”-arc, or is this the end and the next one just the new arc starting up in its aftermath? I think I would say the next one is in, too, but I’m not sure, as “Hero” *does* have a certain sense of closure and finality and in many ways feel like a, well, arc-ending episode. If this had been Buffy, this episode would have ended a season.
12. October 2006 @ 22:20 ( Permalink )
Well, episode 10 refers a lot to Doyle, naturally, and it also brings in his successor, if you will, in addition to presenting Cordy’s new ability.
On the other hand, it has an Wolfram and Hart lawyer in it.
But I’d say it was Doyle’s gravøl. A final closure to the Doyle arc. But I’ll get back on this when I’ve finished episode 11.
12. October 2006 @ 23:23 ( Permalink )
Well, I meant, in many ways, you could consider the season opener of Buffy’s sixth season to belong in the fifth season’s arc, since it deals a lot with her sacrifice in it and its aftermath and the like. Likewise with the first episode of season 7 for season 6’s arc, and so on. But you don’t, do you? You consider it the start of something new, beginning with cleverly building on top of the old. So I wonder if that’s what episode 10 is, or if that’s what episode 11 is and 10 really is part of the Story of Doyle. Because it needn’t be, just because he’s vital to it. You get my meaning, right?
12. October 2006 @ 23:37 ( Permalink )
Yeah, I kinda do. I think.
Only, what was the substance of the Doyle arc, again? My memory’s a little fuzzy…
13. October 2006 @ 00:33 ( Permalink )
XD
Introducing Angel to his new environment and life-situation, the viewer to the series, and setting a foundation for the series to grow upon, more or less.
13. October 2006 @ 00:35 ( Permalink )
Well, one could probably say that it had. Angel, Buffy, Cordelia, Wolfram&Hart, the PTB, LA, and probably other things as well, had been introduced. (Note that when I say e.g. “Angel”, I don’t only refer to the character in itself — I also refer to everything associated with it. In Angel’s case, this’d be his relationship to Buffy, his past, his quest for redemption, and so on.)
However, Wesley, who I assume that we both see as an important part of the “environment”, isn’t introduced before episode 10. If he’d been introduced earlier, as you said you’d once thought he should have been, it would have been easier to set the end of the Doyle arc to 9. But as it is? I’d say that both 10 and 11 help strengthen the message most history lecturers try to beat into us students: There are rarely breaks (aka. sudden, radical changes), usually everything which seems sudden is just part of a continuing process — the causes of which are often unknown to us. At least for a while.
13. October 2006 @ 00:48 ( Permalink )
You might be right.
So, arc 1, episodes 1×1-11? That’s half a season, so that would be very symmetrical.
13. October 2006 @ 00:52 ( Permalink )
I’d be more with you on a 1-9, with at least 10-11 as interim episodes. But I’ll have to watch 12, first, or at least reach a point where I feel certain that the Lindsey arc has begun. So I’ll be back in 45′.
13. October 2006 @ 01:17 ( Permalink )
I’m not using interrim-episodes in this system. Either they are the ending of the first arc, they’re an arc on their own, or they’re the humble beginnings of a new one.
13. October 2006 @ 01:58 ( Permalink )
Then I’d say that everything this far –1-12 — is part of the Doyle arc. Because Lindsey? Not seen so much as a toenail clipping of him since City Of.
I’ll try to dedicate a paragraph to this in the episode 12 post.
13. October 2006 @ 02:04 ( Permalink )
“Because Lindsey? Not seen so much as a toenail clipping of him since City Of.”
You’re starting to speak like they do in Sunnydale too, I see. XD
13. October 2006 @ 02:22 ( Permalink )
Lindsey isn’t necessarily THE key element of the arc, though, just as Doyle wasn’t. It’s just that it clearly ends when he leaves in “Dead End”, and he’s heavily involved as it begins (renting Faith, considering joining the good guys, losing an arm, etc) too, as well as in the middle (which revolves to a large extent around Darla, with whom he’s in love) so he feels essential to the arc.
13. October 2006 @ 02:31 ( Permalink )
I hope I’ll be able to remember these arcs of yours, so that I can comment on them as I progress through the series. They seem accurate at the moment, but I’ve barely finished one of them yet, so…
13. October 2006 @ 02:42 ( Permalink )
Oh, and talking like they do in Sunnydale? Not a problem for me.
And the funny thing? I formulated the above sentence (as well as this one) without thinking that I do the exact same thing again.)
13. October 2006 @ 02:43 ( Permalink )
And finally: There’s a surgeon in Scrubs season 4 who talks like this — by first asking questions, them answering them himself. Annoying guy.
13. October 2006 @ 02:44 ( Permalink )
Yeah, ’cause, you know, us Q&A-people? Rather big with the annoying.
13. October 2006 @ 13:13 ( Permalink )