It took me a while to get there, but I finally managed to goad myself into seeing the second episode of the seventh season of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” (and how cheesy a title isn’t that?). “Beneath You”. A nice, ambiguous title.
Again: SPOILERS!
I finally figured out what I think I suspected during the opening of episode 1: The girls who are being killed by black robed men are Slayers, or rather potential Slayers. I expect that they try to release some kind of big, bad beastie by doing this — probably the Hellmouth itself, although it could be too early in the season for that. (Although I don’t consider that to be likely.) I should have figured this out right away, but that’s the disadvantage of a chaotic-analytical mind for ya. ![]()
The fact that Buffy dreams about these murders should be taken as proof, or at least an indication, of the Slayer and Slayerettes (aka. the potential Slayers) being connected in some way.
So, back to the immediate happenings in the episode. First, it was Buffy’s first day at work. And I really begin to wonder at this Principal. I mean, the first principal was completely unaware of anything going on at Sunnydale High, at least until the hyena pupils got him. Principal Snyder (or however it was spelled) was also ignorant. He was a disgusting little rat-man, but not connected to demons in anyway. (And Mayor Wilkins was blown to pieces too soon after he ate Snyder, for the latter one to be integrated with the former, to put it that way.) But now… First of all, this guy seems too normal and charming. His office is right on top of the Hellmouth. The school was rebuilt just in time for it to kill some students before the Apocalypse, and he was hired as its first principal. A coincident? Maybe…
The main, non-arc related plot was decent. The huge worm thing was rather silly, but it reminded me of Dune and Tremors, which was kinda cool. That it was Anya who had “created” it was a nice twist; perhaps her reversing of the spell is part of what gets her killed later? (Oh gods, that’s cerntainly one spoiler I wish I’d never read.)
However, now I begin to inch closer to the element of this episode that really bugs me, and distracts me from focusing on the rest of the episode. Spike. Is he mad? Is he connected to what’s about to happen? Is he just suffering from the after-effects of getting back his soul? Does he really see dead people? (Ooh, n00b reference. :P)
My answers: Yes, that’s certainly a possibility. Yes, the fact that he uttered the same phrase as that Slayerette who was killed in Berlin seems to indicate that he’s somehow connected to the upcoming events. Yes, that’s also a possibility. Perhaps the effects of questions #2 and 3 combine into #1. As for the last question, I’m sure that he sees something. The tricky thing is figuring out what he’s actually seeing…
Moving on, but at the same time staying where we were, we take a look at the title, which I referred to earlier as “ambiguous”. Obviously, the first and most irrelevant meaning of it, is the reference to the Great Manworm Demon. The second is equally obvious, and is the reference to that utterance that was repeated again and again throughout the episode: “From beneath you it devours,” or something along those lines. Finally, there’s the slightly less obvious reference, which struck me during the second scene where Spike was involved. Spike is beneath Buffy at the moment. And this was, despite of the plotline, a Spike episode. In the last scene, he performed a long monologue, that I unfortunately didn’t manage to grasp the finer detalis of, as my new speakers aren’t prperly tuned yet. I did, however, manage to understand that he told Buffy about his soul. He also mentioned the “from beneath you” phrase again, but wether or not Buffy recognized that, I don’t know. I’d totally understand her if she didn’t, as she was a little baffled by the news she’d just received.
Speaking of that phrase. “From beneath you it devours.” Not only is the “beneath you” part ambiguous; so is the entire sentence. Primarily, there’s the question of wether or not to interpret it literally (ie. in reference to the Hellmouth and whatever’s stirring down there) or metaphorically (ie. Spike’s reappearence and his effect on Buffy). At the moment, I’m thinking both…
All in all, it was a decent episode. The “most touching scene of the entire series”, that Loki referred to in a comment yesterday, I never really discovered. Although I’m guessing he meant the last scene in the church. I expect it could have been more touching if I’d been more closely attached to the Spike character, but I’ve not been able to shake off the goofy impression he made in the first episodes he appeared in, so I was unable to let his torment touch me. So I still consider the scene with Xander and Willow by the old temple, close to the end of BS6×22 - Grave, as the most touching one.
Speaking of Will, it was nice to see that she’s on her way home. I miss the scoobies!
Oh, and this should be the italics code, if things work out the way I hope:
italics
For bold, add this code:
bold

Posts
Looks like the code thing didn’t work.
But the code for italics is (em)text(/em), where you replace the () with
Same procedure for bold, only replace em with stong
25. August 2006 @ 00:43 ( Permalink )
OK, after the “replace the () with”, there’s supposed to be some signs, and that’s the crow’s mouths that can be found in the bottom left corner of a keyboard, between z and left shift.
I hope this was intelligible.
25. August 2006 @ 00:45 ( Permalink )
Well, yes, it’s not THE most touching scene, I didn’t mean that, but it’s the most touching scene to come completely out of nowhere. Also, it didn’t make that huge an impact on me, either, first time around, but the second and third time, especially when paying attention to what Spike was saying (which you admit to not having done), it, well, killed me. And I’m not that huge a Spike-fan. (Obviously, I love the character, but he’s not my favourite, or even second or third) Mind you, I had just re-watched very touching and character-driven Spike-episodes from season 5 right before I re-watched this episode the last time I saw it, so I might have been influenced by that.
As for the “beneath you”, yes, you raise very insightful and good points, however, you are missing one reference - the “you’re beneath me”-phrase in “A Fool For Love”, the phrase first uttered by Spike’s first love back when he was human, which threw him into the despair which ultimately put him in a situation where Drusilla foudn him, the phrase he in a sense during his entire life as a vampire tried to raise above and make shame of, and the phrase Buffy so carelessly utters as she walks away from him near the ending of the episode, leaving him once again shattered in the alley, pathetically grabbling after the dollar-bills she’d given him for the information.
I recommend, if you feel distanced to the Spike-character, that you re-watch the Spike-centred-episodes “Lover’s Walk” (from season 3), “Fool for Love”, “Crush” and “Intervention” (from season 5), and then re-watch this scene. There’s another episode (and some scenes in yet others) in this season you’ll have far more interest in if you can shrug off the “Spike is comedic relief”-sensation you’ve gotten from season 4. Watching the four episodes I listed over should kill that, especially if you go into them paying attention to Spike’s character.
Anyway, I agree, the scene in “Grave” is probably the most touching one, but there are so many too choose from, all brilliant in their own ways, I won’t repeat my mistake by saying for sure.
An excellent report on the episode, by the way, if you write this detailed about every one of them, I’ll be getting lots of enjoyment out of your season 7-watching!
25. August 2006 @ 02:00 ( Permalink )
Oh, and by the way, remember, Angel stumbled around as a homeless-guy for a century after regaining HIS soul, it would be more odd had Spike NOT been acting strangely mere months after.
25. August 2006 @ 02:02 ( Permalink )
I see I also forgot to comment on your comment on the title of the show - yes, it is cheesy, intentionally so, it’s part of the basic idea behind the show when it started, this whole parody on the pretty, silly blonde in horror movies always getting killed and here, instead, kicking ass. Sadly, I think the title has alienated a lot of potential fans who obviously can’t see the parody-element before they get into the show - I know I would never have gotten into it had I not watched the less cheesy-titled spin-off “Angel” and loved it, and that’s just because of the title. Now that I understand its content, I don’t mind it, but seeing as the title is the main outwards face for a television show to its potential public, I think they should have gone with something less esoteric. It is maybe my one big complaint on the entire series.
25. August 2006 @ 15:00 ( Permalink )
“An excellent report on the episode, by the way, if you write this detailed about every one of them, I’ll be getting lots of enjoyment out of your season 7-watching!”
I hope I’ll be able to write at least half as long posts as this one and the last one, but if I get into the rythm of watching ten episodes per day again, I doubt I will. But I think I’ll be able to wring out a few paragraphs on each episode.
“Oh, and by the way, remember, Angel stumbled around as a homeless-guy for a century after regaining HIS soul, it would be more odd had Spike NOT been acting strangely mere months after.”
Yeah, that’s what I thought too, although I didn’t mention it.
And thanks for the tips on which episodes to see to better my relationship to Spike.
25. August 2006 @ 22:03 ( Permalink )
No problem, I had a Spike-a-ton early June this summer, which consisted of those episodes plus one later in season 7 which has some of my all-time-favourite Spike-scenes.
26. August 2006 @ 00:05 ( Permalink )
Yeah, when you mention it, I can remember hearing (or, more precisely, reading) about that Spike-marathon somewhere else (probably on your non-blog). How long did that take, by the way? And how many episodes was Spike in?
5. September 2006 @ 18:29 ( Permalink )
Just one evening - we’d seen the last third or quarter or so of Buffy’s fifth season the two days before, and those are kind of Spike-heavy, so it was four episodes - “Lover’s Walk”, “Fool for Love”, “Crush” and the season 7-one you haven’t gotten to yet. “Intervention” we’d just seen in the “season 5-end-athon” or whatchamacallit. It got late, so we ended it there, but otherwise, we would probably have had gone on with some Spike-centred episodes from Angel’s fifth season.
As for your last question, I don’t understand - how many of the episodes we saw in our Spike-aton which had Spike in them? Er… all?
5. September 2006 @ 19:49 ( Permalink )
It was such a silly question. Pay it no heed.
5. September 2006 @ 20:30 ( Permalink )
Allrightythen.
5. September 2006 @ 20:42 ( Permalink )