Angel’s up and about again, and after having dealt with his mischievous son he turns to the issue he spent second most time hallucinating about when he was submerged in the salty waves: Cordelia. We get to see another awesome Wesley scene, where he shows that he can run a tighter ship than Angel, and that he can handle himself in a fight. He’s come a long way since his appearance in BS3 and in “Parting Gifts”, one might say.
Angel also runs into Gwen — one of my favourite minor protagonists. She kinda reminds me of Rogue from X-Men, seeing as they both have problems with normal human interaction, as well as some common features in how they look. Also, I seem to remember Rogue going on a small crime spree with Gambit in “Ultimate X-Men Vol. 5″ or some such, so they could possibly have some professional stuff in common, too. Anyway, like I said, Gwen is one of my favourites. She’s witty, she’s independent, and she has just the right amout of grey in her moral compass (wow, look at me go, mixing metaphors like that, making them into the kind of sense that’s not) to make her interesting.
Apart from that, it’s fun to observe that Lilah’s bold statements in “Deep Down”, about fear not being one of her failures, is falsified. I mean, I remember her being afraid like a chicken who’s sharing its poultry yard with a fox back in the day, when it was time for the bicentennial review or something at W&F, so I was already aware that she, ehem, strained the truth quite a bit. But seeing her disprove her statements so early wasstill quite fun.
Finally, Cordelia has only three sentences in this episode, and all of them are uttered in an outburst she makes following Angel’s statement about her being at home, where ever she is: “What are you, deficient?! Get me out of here!” Ye Gods, it is good to see that someone keeps that old Sunnydale spirit alive and kicking in LA. ![]()

Posts
Though not technically in LA, more like in higher planes, by a person who just happen to be watching LA at the moment.
5. December 2006 @ 02:05 ( Permalink )
I should probably delete the above spam post, but for some reason I’d rather read Ultimate X-men.
A task for another day, then.
4. January 2007 @ 13:06 ( Permalink )
You know… You’re lazy.
Enjoy!
4. January 2007 @ 16:47 ( Permalink )
I’d make some kind of “enjoy the Ultimate Xitement”-joke, but I’ll restrain myself.
4. January 2007 @ 17:38 ( Permalink )
Much appreciated.
4. January 2007 @ 20:41 ( Permalink )
Win-win, then.
5. January 2007 @ 00:37 ( Permalink )
There, spam deleted. But I seriously wonder what made this post so exciting for the spambots to comment…
11. January 2007 @ 15:16 ( Permalink )
Probably, the first one picked this one by an accident, and the others saw the first.
But hey, I ain’t any spambots psychatrist (Feel free to translate the last word.)
11. January 2007 @ 20:04 ( Permalink )
Who the fuck (ooh, pun) is Jenna jameson?
14. January 2007 @ 18:03 ( Permalink )
Sweet, innocent little boy.
Believe me, though, you’re not missing out on anything. She’s justa trashy pornstar. Obviously.
16. January 2007 @ 14:31 ( Permalink )
“She’s justa trashy pornstar.”
As opposed to the chaste ones… O.o
16. January 2007 @ 23:46 ( Permalink )
Yeah, that was probably not my greatest moment.
17. January 2007 @ 12:27 ( Permalink )
;D
They just *won’t* give up!
18. January 2007 @ 02:13 ( Permalink )
Neither will I.
18. January 2007 @ 15:11 ( Permalink )
XD
Pyrrhos-victory?
18. January 2007 @ 16:02 ( Permalink )
Nah, I think it’s more like that Greek guy in Hades, I think he might have been a king of some kind, who has to shove a huge rock up a hill, but when he reaches the top, the rock rolls down again. Sisyfos labour, I think it’s called in Norwegian, at least, but I’m unsure of whether or not it’s an idiom in English.
18. January 2007 @ 16:05 ( Permalink )
His name is Sisyphous, I think, though I might be spelling it wrong.
18. January 2007 @ 22:59 ( Permalink )