… but then I actually learned some stuff about the American Left, and I started to wonderr: Maybe there’s a reason why the Right is as it is?
First some background: This last week, I’ve been reading “The Right Nation: Conservative Power In America”, written by a couple of British “Economist” journalists. This is a book that maps the history and anatomy of Conservative America, from the early 1900s up ’till 2004. And it’s a fun read. However, as a person who feels closer to the Left than to the Right, I often shudder at all the idiocy my “allies” in the US have initiated. Like the phenomenon of “busing”, which I’m sure you’re all able to find out more about if you feel like it. But one thing that really, really surprised me, is this:
Michael Smith, the head of the Home School Legal Defense (an association working for the rights of homeschoolers), said to the British journalists that his first case “featured a five-year-old who was being homeschooled because her school punished her for saying grace silently before a meal.”
I am seriously bereft of words when I think of this case; how is it possible to distort freedom of religion and all that into such a monstrous parody of itself? I mean, I don’t mind the secularisation of education (I’m more likely to applaud it, really) and most kinds of bans on collective prayer in schools. But this? This is just stupid.

Posts
Your mistake is a common but understandable one. You’re confusing the American Right in particular with the American system of government in general:
They’re all nuts.
It’s not limited to the one party. They’re a wide variety of different nuts, of course, but they’re all nuts. (Let’s just hope they start favouring the peanuts and keep off the coconuts for a while, and we’ll be fine.)
10. February 2007 @ 17:46 ( Permalink )
That could very well be true. And perhaps the loonyness of the respective political wings reinforces the loonyness of the other wing, so that they make each other more loony?
11. February 2007 @ 00:12 ( Permalink )
That, or they’re just loony.
11. February 2007 @ 12:09 ( Permalink )
Nah, I don’t think they’re looney because of eachother. I think they’re looney because of eachother’s supporters. It seems like it’s almost impossible to keep a relevant and completely serious public debate over there… :/
11. February 2007 @ 15:43 ( Permalink )
Unless, ironically, it’s on the Daily Show…
11. February 2007 @ 18:43 ( Permalink )