On the sidebar thingies, specifically. I’m a minimalist in my heart of hearts, and I feel that I might have gone against that when I added yet another two thingies to the sidebar.
So, are there too many of them? Can any of them be axed? And what about the way they’re organised? Could they be reorganised, perhaps?
Thus Spoketh Terje — now also interactive. (Yeah…
)

Posts
I’m so conservative I’m not conservative at all, but reactionist, so I say, keep’em as is, and if you have to do changes, change by addition, not omittion or edition. That’s the Roman Way, after all, and they ruled the known world for, like, a millenia.
12. February 2007 @ 15:22 ( Permalink )
As I see it, the “Last posts” is totally redundant. Also, if I may make a wish, I’d like to see the “Last Comments”. But the searching could actually be useful.
12. February 2007 @ 16:11 ( Permalink )
Oh, and by “see the “Last Comments”,”, I mean to have the over the categories.
12. February 2007 @ 16:12 ( Permalink )
Indeed, the last-comment-thingie is way too far down. And “Categories” should be all the way at the bottom, because it’s so damned long. But apart from that it’s nice. (and indeed, the “last posts”-thing only works if it’s at the top.)
12. February 2007 @ 20:26 ( Permalink )
Yeah, I myself have been annoyed at having to scroll all the way down to the “Recent comments”, so I think I’ll go change that right away.
12. February 2007 @ 21:23 ( Permalink )
I’m a minimalist in my heart of hearts
That explains the utter lack of categories, I suppose
But other than that,
What Ole said…
(Don’t you just looooove imitating Loki? :P)
12. February 2007 @ 22:56 ( Permalink )
Those who can’t be great, imitate greatness, it’s the way of life.
13. February 2007 @ 00:01 ( Permalink )
Pluss: It’s fun!
13. February 2007 @ 09:17 ( Permalink )
There’s that, too.
13. February 2007 @ 11:42 ( Permalink )
Imitating greatness is imitating you copying my opinions?
… That’s deep, dude…
13. February 2007 @ 20:07 ( Permalink )
It was intended to be.
13. February 2007 @ 21:19 ( Permalink )
“Imitating greatness is imitating you copying my opinions?
… That’s deep, dude…”
Isn’t that so deep it’s almost zen? (A.k.a. “meaningless”, in my private dictionary…)
14. February 2007 @ 08:59 ( Permalink )
Seeing as your private dictionary obviously doesn’t share the definitions in use by the general public, any question asked by you, especially questions concerning the identification of concepts and defintions of words, cannot be answered. Let us know when you’re back in the shared world, eh?
14. February 2007 @ 09:12 ( Permalink )
Let us know when you’re back in the shared world, eh?
How do you KNOW that everything doesn’t revolve around Terje? We might all just be little pawns in his own personal world, playing out our parts… Than his world would be the shared world, and he would already be “back”…
14. February 2007 @ 18:34 ( Permalink )
He specified “private”, which excludes “shared”.
14. February 2007 @ 20:51 ( Permalink )
But seeing as he is omnipotent, everything that’s his, is ours.
15. February 2007 @ 08:26 ( Permalink )
No, that’s not the definition of omnipotence, that’s the definition of omniexistance or something like that.
15. February 2007 @ 09:15 ( Permalink )
But you’ve got to admit that being omnipotent is pretty difficult without being omniexsistant.
However, I say as Jonas: Dette er en rent hypotetisk situasjon, og jeg ser derfor ikke nytte av å kommentere på den.
15. February 2007 @ 17:09 ( Permalink )
We should all say as Jonas, and the world would be a much grander place.
‘Cause in Russia, Støre Gahrs YOU.
15. February 2007 @ 17:26 ( Permalink )
“Gahr Stoere is more sexy than Elton John”
- Oscar Wilde
15. February 2007 @ 17:54 ( Permalink )
“Gahr Støre isn’t really that good a secretary of state, but the only things that’re worse are the alternatives.”
- Winston Churchill.
18. February 2007 @ 19:49 ( Permalink )
“Winston Churchill isn’t really all that fat, it’s just that all the alternatives are slimmer.”
- Jens Stoltenberg
18. February 2007 @ 21:13 ( Permalink )
“Jens Stoltenberg isn’t really that handsome, but all the alternatives are uglier.”
- Franklin Delano “FDR” Roosevelt.
Or, wait, that wasn’t really insulting, now was it?
18. February 2007 @ 21:38 ( Permalink )
“What FDR said.”
- Ingrid Schulerud
That, on the other hand, was.
18. February 2007 @ 22:01 ( Permalink )