I take a look at this one. And this one. And suddenly things seem a little brighter.
(And I am well aware that I’ve linked to these stripes almost ten times before, but they really are that… man, I got to get around to reading some Jack Vance soon, so that I can learn some new English adjectives. I’m getting kinda bored of “awesome”, “brilliant” and “great”.)

Posts
Wonderful, fantastic, astonishing, amazing, uncanny, unbelievable, incredible, awe-inspiring, divine, super, lovely, beautiful, glorious, gorgeous, breathtaking, wonderous… etc, etc, etc.
(
16. March 2007 @ 13:52 ( Permalink )
Wonderful, fantastic, astonishing, amazing, uncanny, unbelievable, incredible, awe-inspiring, divine, super, lovely, beautiful, glorious, gorgeous, breathtaking, wonderous… etc, etc, etc.
(Who needs dictionaries when you have me, eh?
)
16. March 2007 @ 13:52 ( Permalink )
Or in this case, I guess, thesauruses, not dictionaries.
And sorry about the double-comment-thing, don’t know what happened with the first one there.
16. March 2007 @ 13:53 ( Permalink )
What about “Lynch” and “lok(i)”?
16. March 2007 @ 14:56 ( Permalink )
That was so far removed from making sense it might just have breached out of our reality and substituted its own, senseless, one.
(I.e. “What the flying frack are you trying to say?”)
16. March 2007 @ 16:28 ( Permalink )
Trying to find new superlatives. I admit that you should read Lotta’s blog to get some of it.
16. March 2007 @ 16:39 ( Permalink )
That was so far removed from making sense it might just have breached out of our reality and substituted its own, senseless, one.
So you’re stating that this reality, this very one where you are in fact reading these words, makes sense?
But Brækar is right, you know. You should read my blog
It’s Lynchytastic!
16. March 2007 @ 18:43 ( Permalink )
“So you’re stating that this reality, this very one where you are in fact reading these words, makes sense?”
I’m stating it has sense (in it). Not that it makes sense (as an entity). Huge difference.
Why would I read a weblog apparently filled to the brink with fan-ravings for an author I won’t have time to read ’til this winter at the earliest?
16. March 2007 @ 19:22 ( Permalink )
I’m stating it has sense (in it). Not that it makes sense (as an entity). Huge difference.
If you say so. I didn’t see it implied, but I’ll let it go, since you’re right.
Why would I read a weblog apparently filled to the brink with fan-ravings for an author I won’t have time to read ’til this winter at the earliest?
Now that was a tad to harsh; I’ve thus far written one fan raving (that was completely) about Scott Lynch. But I see you’re point; why read blogs about things you’re not familiar with?
…?
17. March 2007 @ 12:22 ( Permalink )
By the by: I’ve written much more about Joss Whedon, Firefly and Buffy than I have about authors you haven’t read
I seem to remember you liking that shit, right?
17. March 2007 @ 12:31 ( Permalink )
Yes, but you just referred to it as “shit”, so obviously, your ability to write about it in an interesting and proper manner is severely impaired.
17. March 2007 @ 14:16 ( Permalink )
‘Tis true, I’m ‘fraid.
17. March 2007 @ 19:05 ( Permalink )