Ca. 445 pages.
1984.
Corgi/RandomHouse paperback.
The Orb of Aldur has been recovered, and is to be returned to Riva, where waits not only the Warders of the Orb, but also a profound change in the life of young Garion.
Before I started reading this book, I had received some vague warnings (if they can be called as much) about it being weak. I, however, found it to be a qualitative step up from Magician’s Gambit, and especially from Queen of Sorcery. Where PoP, QoS and MG were all centered around the hunt for the Orb, with a lot of chases, a few ambushes, meetings with every great leader of the West, and your typical LotR Epic stuff, I thought CoS was more ASOIAF-y, so to say. By which I don’t mean that there were a lot of intricate political intrigue or anything like that, but more that the characters stayed in the same place for more than a few days. (Granted, ASOIAF has its share of travelling, too, but it’s nowhere near as much as in LotR — although the characters whose POVs we see the story through are more spread out, of course.) And that felt kinda refreshing.
Refreshing, too, was the fact that Eddings seemed to have gotten hold of his witticisms again. Where Silk often felt contrived and not-so-much-funny in MG, he picked up a bit of slack in CoW (speaking of funny, by the way), and this made the story so much more enjoyable. And that was, to me, pretty much all I read this series for: enjoyment. (Granted, there was some interest in the trappings of stereotypical Epic Fantasy involved, too, but mostly, it was enjoyment.)
Eddings still seemed to have lived and worked in the era before thesauri were invented, but as the plot was a bit less similar to the one in the past three books, this didn’t bother me all that much.
Yet another step up, so I think I’ll reward Castle of Wizardry a shiny 6.5/10.

Posts
Happy you like it reasonably well. Silk is pretty awesome.
23. January 2008 @ 16:52 ( Permalink )
That he is. Also, I think I like the Belgariad quite a bit more than the Riftwar Saga, for instance.
23. January 2008 @ 18:15 ( Permalink )
Really’? Not so at all with me. The Belgariad is funnier, but other than that it’s the Riftwar way inferior. While both make use of stereotypes of the genre, the Belgariad just uses them, the Riftwar actually builds on them, in my opinion. There’s a depth to his characters and his world that, despite being founded on the stereotypes of the genre, feels convincing. With some few exceptions, all in the area of characters (notably Silk, Barak, Beldin, some minor supporting characters and maybe Belgarath) and none as far as cultures and world-building goes, Belgariad does not build beyond the mere clichè like that.
23. January 2008 @ 19:04 ( Permalink )
Oh, I don’t know. I felt the Ulgos and Dryads, as well as the mythology (which was simplistic, but still) was developed a bit, too. Or, obviously, the Ulgos were Dwarves and the Dryads were Elf-surrogates (sure, they’re mythological creatures in their own right, but they’re less common than Elves in this genre), but still.
Naturally, there were elements of The Riftwar that I liked better than elements of The Belgariad (for instance, I prefered Pug to Garion, most of the time), but overall I prefered the Belgariad. It’s a bit hard to point exatly as to why, though, and the difference is hardly that huge. I disliked the ending of The Fiftwar, though, I felt like that stone that arrived was something of a deus ex machina…
24. January 2008 @ 19:35 ( Permalink )
Indeed. But it’s hardly the ending. There’s like thirty books more.
24. January 2008 @ 23:00 ( Permalink )
Hehehe, true.
And come to think of it, I’ve got about eight or ten of them spread out on various bookshelves… :\
25. January 2008 @ 00:13 ( Permalink )