Approximately 445 pages (again!).
1985.
Corgi/RandomHouse paperback.
I feel like most of what can be said of Enchanters’ End Game has already been said in the reviews of the series’ four other volumes, so I’ll restrict myself to summing up the main points, before going on to comment on more general elements of the series as a whole. This last thing will most likely be done in my usual whimsical way, and not by any systematic method, so I’ll probably forget quite a lot.
To start with the bad stuff for once, Eddings’ prose is still some of the most repetitive I’ve seen. The flipside of this, though, is that he still writes rather sparesly, so we don’t have to suffer through endless descriptions of what the characters might or might not be wearing, or the landscapes they’re riding through. Things are still kept simple and to the point.
So, also as usual, thanks to the sparseness of the prose, the rather uninventive plot progresses rapidly enough so that the lack of originality becomes less obvious. The main thing is still hard rides through wild, thinly populated country, with a stop every once in a while to fight some or gather some information. Enchanters’ End Game, however, has an additional element which helps to relieve the monotony, namely Princess Ce’Nedra’s experience of riding East with the army. Granted, Ce’Nedra is hardly the most interesting character, but she herself is likeable, what she witnesses is interesting and the people she travels with entertainingly quarrelsome, enough to make her chapters enjoyable. This is in particular due to the presence of the Western monarchs, whose utilitarianism during their campaign is somewhat impressive.
Garion’s part of the story had Belgarath and Silk to serve in this capacity, and their function as part-time comic sidekicks was so successfully executed I took myself in thinking the almost heretical thought that Frodo and Sam’s journey through the Brown Hills, the Dead Marshes and all that, would have been much more enjoyable if they’d brought along someone with a pinch of a sense of humour. Otherwise, it wasn’t much to say about the journey in itself, except that I’d again like to praise Eddings for not wringing it for more than it was worth. He didn’t include more scenes than necessary with Garion travelling through wilderness and agonizing over his own destiny, and I’m grateful for that. (As ought to be evident from the fact that I’ve basically said so half a dozen times so far.)
The end of the whole shebang was quite nice, too. Not stunningly profound, any of it, just down to earth and a romantic. Which I guess fitted the rest of the series, as nothing previous to this had shown any penchant for the grandiose. The moral of the tale, if it could be called that, felt a bit like that of the final Harry Potter instalment, with its focus on the importance of love. A bit banal, true, but banalities shouldn’t be dismissed just because they are what they are.
In the end, though, the entire Belgariad was hinged on its characters. Not that any of them were overly realistic (although in the respect of witty remarks, whey are more realistic than those of Scott Lynch’s works), but they were decent enough, and utterly adorable. Garion and Ce’Nedra suffered under the handicap of being teenagers, of course, with all the irrational behaviour and whining which follows with that particular turf, but apart from that, all the characters were decently dynamic and rounded. Considering that they are genre fiction characters, I’ve read much worse ones than these. In addition to the core group we got to see a bunch of interesting secondary and tertiary characters, too, such as the King of Gar og Nadrak, the chief eunuch of Nyissa, Errand, the three Wizards of the Vale, ‘Zakath, and many more.
All in all, I liked The Belgariad just slightly less than I like Harry Potter, and I guess that if I’d encountered the former approximately at the same time as I started reading the latter, the difference wouldn’t really be all that much to talk of. In fact, when, on the page after the last chapter was done, I read something like “Join Garion, Aunt Pol, Belgarath and the others on new adventures in The Mallorean!” it took a bit of self-restraint not to run to Amazon and order it. I probably will, in time, though.
Enchanters’ End Game: 6.5/10..
The Belgariad as a whole: 7.0/10.

Posts
Errand and the mentioned chief eunuch is used a lot in the Mallorean, so good that you like it. It also features Beldin’s Nemesis (the third disciple of Torak, seeing as Belgarath monopolized the other two in the first series) and ‘Zakath is obviously used way more as The Mallorean (as the name reveals) take place mainly on his continent. (The world of Garion has two (known) continents, and each series basically explores one of them)
I think that, after your read the Mallorean, you would appreciate checking out the two pre/sequels, “Belgarath The Sorcreror” and “Polgara the Sorceress”, told in first-person-viewpoint by the respective titular characters. I found these books to be better in many respects than the two main series, maybe due to the lack of an overarching Quest-like clichè with the plot. They’re both set in a frame-story taking place after The Mallorean, though, and thus can’t be read before it without spoiling it heavily. (And The Mallorean is far more easily damaged by spoilers than The Belgariad is)
Glad you liked it!
24. January 2008 @ 23:08 ( Permalink )
Me too!
And I probably will check the sequels out some time “soon”, because if they’re anything like The Belgariad, I ought to be able to finish them all in about two weeks.
25. January 2008 @ 00:18 ( Permalink )
They’re very much like the Belgariad. Though, ironically, of all the Eddings-stuff I’ve read, his other books about the cast of the Belgariad are the ones the least resembling the Belgariad. I mean, it resembles a lot, but not nearly as much as “The Redemption of Althalus” or the “Elenium” and “Tamuil”-series do… Or at least it’s not as painfuly obvious all the time.
25. January 2008 @ 03:12 ( Permalink )
I started thinking - have you ever read “The Deed of Paksenarrion” by Elizabeth Moon? I loved the first two books when I was a teenager, but I seem to recall the third one shared a lot of the kind of problems the third Riftwar-book suffers from. But the first two, and maybe especially the very first one, was very refreshing to me back then. Instead of following a hero on a quest we follow a young woman joining an army of mercenaries. As I experienced it Way Back When I thought the description of the training she went through, etc, was very well and convincingly done - I might think otherwise now, but… Anyway, I suddenly started thinking about it. I think you might enjoy it.
26. January 2008 @ 19:47 ( Permalink )
The Mallorean is basically a rewrite with the same characters appearing under different names and the content being the exploration of the characters. As the characters are ‘reused’ it felt amusing but fairly empty.
Same for his other series the Elenium and its sequel series. He is a fantastic character writer but the stand alone books of his are far better crafted.
Althalas the thief is also good.
The Elizabeth moon books arent really comparable. Apart form the fact they are fantasy they arent similar at all. Also they arent character driven in the same way. The Paksenarrion books and the prequel ‘Gid’ books are essentially the equivalent of biblical tales of warrior saints. They have well structured, youth, adulthood, sacfrifice sequences. It really puts them a long way away from most of Eddings stuff.
Both good though. I have a limited appetite for Eddings these days, the prose is excellent but Id like a little action now and again.
28. January 2008 @ 16:15 ( Permalink )
“Althalas the thief is also good.”
I really don’t agree. The individual chapters are well enough written, but when you look at it as a whole, the book was totally devoid of any serious threat, any sense of impending doom or even impending slight problems, and the characters where (as it seems Eddings always does) reincarnations of the Belgariad-cast, switched around, making Silk’s personality into Belgarion’s story-function and Polgara into a goddess but otherwise keeping her the same and so on and so forth.
A lot of the same goes for the Elenium/Tamuil-series, but at least there there was some sense of an actual enemy and the cast couldn’t just keep time-skipping out of any amount of threat. The reason I like the Mallorean is simply because I much prefer reading about the original cast of the Belgariad than reading about them in poorly concealed shuffled reincarnations, and I feel it by virtue of being in the same world needs less distinctiveness to feel like it adds something. I mean, the plot of the Mallorean literally builds on the Belgariad, which, despite the many similarities, I find to be far better than simply copying it like Eddings’ other worlds and series’ do.
As for Moon, I never meant to imply she was similar to Eddings. I just mentioned her here when I thought of her because it was his last literature-related post.
28. January 2008 @ 17:39 ( Permalink )
I like althalas the thief. Its better than most of Eddings. Very few of Eddings books have any threat whatsoever except for the end of trilogy stand off. Mostly its about hte characters meandering through life cheerily interacting with each other in a chummy way.
Althalas is more interesting because its self contained, complete and an easy read. Its not a great Fantasy novel - but its a better than average Eddings.
I agree that eddings plaegarises his own work mercillessly. Its his biggest fault. Still , critical as I can be I still liked all of his series. But its in a bubblegum for the eyes and soul sort of way.
29. January 2008 @ 12:50 ( Permalink )
Agreed on the most part. I just did not find Althalas to be that good at all - the only thing I’ve liked less by him is the very first book of the Elenium. I quite liked books 2 and 3, despite his mentioned usual flaws, but book 1 was dreary beyond belief, and I still can’t fathom why he couldn’t just have shortened most of it down to a prologue in book 2. Aside from that one book, though, Althalas is the worst book I’ve read by him. It suffers from the overpowered heroes-problem to an immense extent when compared to the two Garion-series and the two Sparhawk-series. In the former, the godlike protagonists have somewhat equallizing enemies: Garion has Chamdar/Asharak when he’s young and defenseless and then Torak when he gets more experienced, Pol has to at one point deal with a manipulated god (clearly more powerful than she is herself) in Issa, Silk has Brill/Kordoch, Barak has his inner issues, Belgarath has Ctuchick, Beldin has Urvon, they’re all pitted against Zandramas somehow, there’s the demon lords, Zedar, and most of all maybe all the political tension they have to deal with to avoid internal war among the “good-guy-countries”. Plus you have very good grey-shade-characters in Drosta and Zakath. And with Sparhawk, the characters are themselves far, far less powerful (for the most part) - yes, they do enjoy constant success, but they don’t have the “guaranteed to win by sheer strength of force”-stamp in the forehead the heroes of “The Redemption of Althalus” has. I also very, very much enjoyed the character of Martel who Eddings actually managed to make into something of a captivating presence - the Tamuil was far weaker than the Elenium soley due to the lack of him.
My point is, yes, Althalus shares all the main flaws AND all the main strength of Eddings’ other works - but, alas, it has an additional (and, to me, dooming) one in the utter lack of threat throughout the novel. That being said, I seem to remember the prose itself as quite good for Eddings.
29. January 2008 @ 17:12 ( Permalink )