… or maybe not.
Anyway, last night, after returning home after my visit, well, home, I thought I’d lay down and watch a DVD on my laptop. However, I have a small problem. Most of my DVDs, I’ve seen like 20 times, at least the fun ones. But I also have some 15-20 movies on DVD that I’ve never seen before. This, of course, annoys me, and last night, I came up with a plan: In the next 3 months, I’ll try to watch every unseen DVD I own.
But there’s a catch. Obviously. There’s always a catch; this is a law of nature, just like Murphy’s. And I just realized how brilliantly that name is used in “Scrubs”. But that’s besides the point here.
The catch, you see, is almost all of my unseen DVDs are boring dramas. They’re DVDs I’ve bought when in a quasi-intellectual, pretentious mood. Let’s have a look at the list, shall we?
First of all, there’s The Assassination of Richard Nixon (which I watched last night, by the way, and will post a review of shortly), The Fog of War, The Contender, Electra, Fantastic Four, Donnie Darko, Trainspotting, Godfather II, Godfather III, Blood of Others, All Quiet On The Western Front, Phone Booth, The Crow, Spartacus, Malcolm X, David Lynch’ Dune, Gettysburg and The Last Samurai.
Sure, many of these are probably not boring. Most of them are actually quite good, I can imagine. But few of them sounds like something I’d like to sit down and watch after a long day of studying — notable exeptions being Donnie Darko, Fantastic Four and Electra. (Not that I study much, but you get the point.) When I watch a film, I like to relax and be entertained; I get intellectual stimulation and whatnot from what I study. Admittedly, it can be refreshing to watch something uncomfrotable, but the main problem is that even though I might enjoy actually seeing a serious-ish film, I’ll never (at least rarely) get motivated enough to actually start seeing one. So I see the same, rather substanceless but entertaining films again and again and again.
But this fall and winter, things’ll change. I’ll get through at least 75 % of these films, even if it kills me. (The probability of it killing me is, of course, non-existant.) But if I manage to sit down and watch one or two of these per week, it’ll greatly increase my chances of making my 104-films-per-year goal. After all, I only need to see 23 more this year (seeing as I managed 55 in the first 6 months of 2006), and these films alone number almost 20.
So I’ll see what I can do…
Oh well, at least I got to quote Baldrick, even if it was cheap.

Posts
Among those, I have only seen Fantastic Four. And as you said, it is not intellectual. it is an easy plot, somewhat good effects and you dont have to think at all. And by the way, great to see a flim where the heroes dont try to hide.
Great to have you back Terje.
4. October 2006 @ 14:20 ( Permalink )
“great to see a flim where the heroes dont try to hide.”
I’m not sure what you’re referring to with this sentence, but I hope you’re not trying to criticise the X-Men films…
“Great to have you back Terje.”
Great to be back.
Gotta try to get my arse over to tidshjulet.net sometime, too.
4. October 2006 @ 14:28 ( Permalink )
Well, X-men are not the worst. But if you look at Superman, Batman, Fantdonald (If he counts) and all those others super-heroes, they all trie to hide. If someone is getting a bit close to knowing who it is… CRISIS. And to find some heroes who goes out, saves the world and then does an interwiev… THAT is fine.
4. October 2006 @ 17:41 ( Permalink )
Well, my knowledge of the Fantastic Four is somewhat limited, but weren’t all four of them astronauts, who gained their abilities when exposed to some kind of cosmic radiation? If so, it goes almost without saying that they would have a hard time hiding their true identities (which is what I suppose you mean with “hiding”?), considering that astronauts are relatively famous, and that they’d most likely be tested when they returned to Earth.
The other heroes you mentioned are in quite different situations. Superman’s actual identity is, in fact, Superman, or Kal-El, if you will. Sure, he hides as Clark Kent, but that can be explained by refering to Superman’s probable desire to have at least some personal free time.
As for Superman and Batman, they’re both vigilantes, and being a vigilante brings with it certain risks, seeing as such activities are illegal in most societies. Also, there’s the vengeance motive, of course: By hiding their true identities, they make it harder for criminals who they send to jail to take revenge by hurting them or their loved ones.
It’s quite elementary, really.
4. October 2006 @ 22:48 ( Permalink )
Also, Batman’s paranoid. He’d have a thousand secret identities on top of each other if he could.
He probably does, too.
Batman’s SO AWESOME.
4. October 2006 @ 23:54 ( Permalink )
From what I have understood, FF was a relatively unknown group who travelled to outer space just to check on something. Then they get hit by “something” and turns into mutants. As far as I understood (not to much, and it have been a while) they came down pretty untouched by the media. It is when the Torch goes out without saying anything the trouble starts.
Also, a reason for them not to hide, could be that one of them can not turn himself on and of.
Anyway, refreshing to see someone saying: Hi, I am a mutant. Wanna say hi?
5. October 2006 @ 12:09 ( Permalink )