<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lord of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689</link>
	<description>Everything and nothing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1-beta</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>Deadwood season 3 was probably a little bit weaker than the other two in my book, now that I think on it, but only marginally so. Then again, I think I preferred the second one to the first one, so what do I know... They're all awesome anyway. If you like them, by the way, you should probably check out The Wire at some point. :)

The LotR EE, I'd like to mention, since they're brought up, do very different things in the three movies, if you ask me. With FotR, it makes it more nuanced and in-depth and brings the movie even closer to the book, and makes an excellent movie pretty damned close to perfect. With tTT, instead, it makes a rather heavy movie a little lighter, giving us more character-moments and breathing-air between the major scenes, which makes for a vast improvement over the somewhat less than excellent (though still very good) cinematic version. And with RoK, the EE disappointed me. Adding to the immense stupidity of the skull-avalanche and its ilk, I mostly felt like the RotK-extended cut just added scenes to the movie, making it longer but not necessarily better or worse. Which is too bad. If it had been a refinement like FotR's or an improvement like tTT's, it would have med RoK EE the best movie of them all. As it was, I felt like I got more or less the same out of watching the cinematic release, sadly. Of course, the cinematic release was superb, but still.

"BSG re-watch? Now THERE’S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it’s ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes…"
The man's a genious. I'd like to do that. Ohyes. Probably won't, but man would I like to.

(And Amras, if he's more up to date on reading magazines about tv-shows than he is on the shows themselves, then he is a bloody buffoon and asking for it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deadwood season 3 was probably a little bit weaker than the other two in my book, now that I think on it, but only marginally so. Then again, I think I preferred the second one to the first one, so what do I know&#8230; They&#8217;re all awesome anyway. If you like them, by the way, you should probably check out The Wire at some point. <img src='http://natsecorma.net/terje/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The LotR EE, I&#8217;d like to mention, since they&#8217;re brought up, do very different things in the three movies, if you ask me. With FotR, it makes it more nuanced and in-depth and brings the movie even closer to the book, and makes an excellent movie pretty damned close to perfect. With tTT, instead, it makes a rather heavy movie a little lighter, giving us more character-moments and breathing-air between the major scenes, which makes for a vast improvement over the somewhat less than excellent (though still very good) cinematic version. And with RoK, the EE disappointed me. Adding to the immense stupidity of the skull-avalanche and its ilk, I mostly felt like the RotK-extended cut just added scenes to the movie, making it longer but not necessarily better or worse. Which is too bad. If it had been a refinement like FotR&#8217;s or an improvement like tTT&#8217;s, it would have med RoK EE the best movie of them all. As it was, I felt like I got more or less the same out of watching the cinematic release, sadly. Of course, the cinematic release was superb, but still.</p>
<p>&#8220;BSG re-watch? Now THERE’S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it’s ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes…&#8221;<br />
The man&#8217;s a genious. I&#8217;d like to do that. Ohyes. Probably won&#8217;t, but man would I like to.</p>
<p>(And Amras, if he&#8217;s more up to date on reading magazines about tv-shows than he is on the shows themselves, then he is a bloody buffoon and asking for it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amras Elensar</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5502</link>
		<dc:creator>Amras Elensar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5502</guid>
		<description>I haven't gotten around to season 3 of Deadwood. It's been on hold for a couple of months now; will probably watch it in the summer. Season 2 got a strong 9,5/10 or somesuch on the blog.

"Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven’t seen/read."

I envy you.

As for LotR, well, I have trouble grading much between them because they're actually one gigantic film cut into three pieces. Yeah, I could probably say that FotR &#62; RotK &#62; tTT, but in my mind their worth a combined 10/10, which is easier anyhow. I don't grade the book for each individual book, even though I easily could, because they weren't meant to be read like that by Tolkien, and it feels unnatural to do so. 

Not everyone likes Blade Runner - and it IS too slow - but I have a hard time understanding such freakish sentiments. I watched it three times in a row (granted though that I was actually writing an analysis of it at the time), and it got better by each viewing.

BSG re-watch? Now THERE'S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it's ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes...

Btw, Terje - I really hope you got around to the last episode of season 3 before you read the last SFX magazine. They had printed an epic spoiler in gigantic letters on the interview with Tigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten around to season 3 of Deadwood. It&#8217;s been on hold for a couple of months now; will probably watch it in the summer. Season 2 got a strong 9,5/10 or somesuch on the blog.</p>
<p>&#8220;Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven’t seen/read.&#8221;</p>
<p>I envy you.</p>
<p>As for LotR, well, I have trouble grading much between them because they&#8217;re actually one gigantic film cut into three pieces. Yeah, I could probably say that FotR &gt; RotK &gt; tTT, but in my mind their worth a combined 10/10, which is easier anyhow. I don&#8217;t grade the book for each individual book, even though I easily could, because they weren&#8217;t meant to be read like that by Tolkien, and it feels unnatural to do so. </p>
<p>Not everyone likes Blade Runner - and it IS too slow - but I have a hard time understanding such freakish sentiments. I watched it three times in a row (granted though that I was actually writing an analysis of it at the time), and it got better by each viewing.</p>
<p>BSG re-watch? Now THERE&#8217;S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it&#8217;s ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes&#8230;</p>
<p>Btw, Terje - I really hope you got around to the last episode of season 3 before you read the last SFX magazine. They had printed an epic spoiler in gigantic letters on the interview with Tigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5500</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5500</guid>
		<description>Deadwood season 1? I take it you haven't watched the other two, then? Because I don't think the show got weaker.

Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven't seen/read.

LotR extended editions.... I'll give a six on the dice to all three sure. As well as to the cinematic editions of FotR and probably RoK. But I'd not give all three 10/10. I'd probably end up with 10, 9.5 and 9.5 for the EE's and 10, 8.5 and 9.5 for the cinematic versions.

Blade Runner I've no idea what's up with. Everybody seems to see some form of brilliance in it that just passes me by somehow. I feel like I'm losing out on something - I'd give that movie 7/10 at most, and even that'd feel generous.

BSG season 1, if I'd be able to grade tv-shows like that, I think I'd have given 9 or 9.5 , but not 10. Season 2, however, might have gotten there. I'd have to do a rewatch to be sure, though, seasons 1 and 2 blend a lot together in my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deadwood season 1? I take it you haven&#8217;t watched the other two, then? Because I don&#8217;t think the show got weaker.</p>
<p>Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven&#8217;t seen/read.</p>
<p>LotR extended editions&#8230;. I&#8217;ll give a six on the dice to all three sure. As well as to the cinematic editions of FotR and probably RoK. But I&#8217;d not give all three 10/10. I&#8217;d probably end up with 10, 9.5 and 9.5 for the EE&#8217;s and 10, 8.5 and 9.5 for the cinematic versions.</p>
<p>Blade Runner I&#8217;ve no idea what&#8217;s up with. Everybody seems to see some form of brilliance in it that just passes me by somehow. I feel like I&#8217;m losing out on something - I&#8217;d give that movie 7/10 at most, and even that&#8217;d feel generous.</p>
<p>BSG season 1, if I&#8217;d be able to grade tv-shows like that, I think I&#8217;d have given 9 or 9.5 , but not 10. Season 2, however, might have gotten there. I&#8217;d have to do a rewatch to be sure, though, seasons 1 and 2 blend a lot together in my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amras Elensar</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5499</link>
		<dc:creator>Amras Elensar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5499</guid>
		<description>Blade Runner, Platoon, The Lord of the Rings, Extended Editions 1-2-3 (can't differentiate the grades between them, but I like the first one best) and the book itself of course, Donnie Darko, Requiem For a Dream, "Catch-22" (the book), BSG seasons 1-2 and Deadwood (season 1) are the films/books/shows that have or would receive the honour of a perfect score. I'm sure I'm forgetting a couple of goodies, but that's what I came up with.

It does appear to be a rather exclusive club of awesomeness, which is exactly how I prefer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blade Runner, Platoon, The Lord of the Rings, Extended Editions 1-2-3 (can&#8217;t differentiate the grades between them, but I like the first one best) and the book itself of course, Donnie Darko, Requiem For a Dream, &#8220;Catch-22&#8243; (the book), BSG seasons 1-2 and Deadwood (season 1) are the films/books/shows that have or would receive the honour of a perfect score. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m forgetting a couple of goodies, but that&#8217;s what I came up with.</p>
<p>It does appear to be a rather exclusive club of awesomeness, which is exactly how I prefer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5492</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5492</guid>
		<description>Insane standars? Heck no. "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: Extended Edition", sir. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insane standars? Heck no. &#8220;Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: Extended Edition&#8221;, sir. <img src='http://natsecorma.net/terje/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dread Pirate Terje</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dread Pirate Terje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5489</guid>
		<description>(Please note that my use of the word "perfect" here is dumb; perfection is obviously a concept I don't believe in, and as such I use the word that designates it to describe things that are "merely" extremely good.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Please note that my use of the word &#8220;perfect&#8221; here is dumb; perfection is obviously a concept I don&#8217;t believe in, and as such I use the word that designates it to describe things that are &#8220;merely&#8221; extremely good.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dread Pirate Terje</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5488</link>
		<dc:creator>Dread Pirate Terje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5488</guid>
		<description>Also, you people seem to have insane standards as to what constitutes a perfect 10 movie. :P

But yeah, it's an extremely Terje movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, you people seem to have insane standards as to what constitutes a perfect 10 movie. <img src='http://natsecorma.net/terje/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But yeah, it&#8217;s an extremely Terje movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5483</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5483</guid>
		<description>It's no 10/10, however, it WAS really good, honestly, I remember I was impressed. But I get that it's a very Terje-movie, more so than it fits us, I think, and thus it stands to reason that a movie I remember as "a strong 9 that Terje'd probably like" would be a 10 to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no 10/10, however, it WAS really good, honestly, I remember I was impressed. But I get that it&#8217;s a very Terje-movie, more so than it fits us, I think, and thus it stands to reason that a movie I remember as &#8220;a strong 9 that Terje&#8217;d probably like&#8221; would be a 10 to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amras Elensar</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5481</link>
		<dc:creator>Amras Elensar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5481</guid>
		<description>I'll have to do a rewatch of this. It's been years since I first watched, and I can't remember anything about it, really. Certainly not that it was worth a 10/10.

I hope I'm wrong, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to do a rewatch of this. It&#8217;s been years since I first watched, and I can&#8217;t remember anything about it, really. Certainly not that it was worth a 10/10.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;m wrong, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/689#comment-5479</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/terje/?p=689#comment-5479</guid>
		<description>I remember loving this movie in the theatre, but I doubt I'd have gone all to the ten with it. Maaybe 9,5. Still, damned good, that's for certain. I loved the ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember loving this movie in the theatre, but I doubt I&#8217;d have gone all to the ten with it. Maaybe 9,5. Still, damned good, that&#8217;s for certain. I loved the ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
