It’s been nearly two weeks since I watched Lord of War, so this’ll be a brief review, but better late than never, eh?
First off, what struck me during this second watching of Lord of War was how similar, in many ways, it was to Charlie Wilson’s War. They both dealt with serious subjects, and they both put more or less humorous spins on their angles of approach. Or perhaps more precisely, tragi-comic, as they both painted happy faces on what is essentially great tragedies: Charlie Wilson’s effort for the Afghans ended more or less with a kinda Pyrrhic victory, and the story Yuri Orlov told in so amusing a way is the story of how it is possible for peasants in developing countries to murder each other with the stuff resting at the pinnacle of human arms technology development.
That much for the subject matter of the movie. The technical aspects were no less brilliant. The bullet’s story told during the opening credits is a magnificent little creation, and a splendid example of the brilliant way in which this movie was filmed. Furthermore, this is Nicholas Cage in the kind of role he’s meant to play: a quiet, cold and brainy fellow. Unfortunately, he seems to labour under the misapprehension that he’s some kind of action hero, instead of just sticking to the parts he does better than just about anything. The rest of the cast is top-notch too, as is everything else. Heck, even flamin’ Jared Leto works perfectly!
A most highly recommended movie. If you haven’t watched it yet, go rectify, and if you have, go re-watch. Absolutely fantastic stuff. Even the didactic parts work well and are almost a seemless part of the rest of the movie. 10/10.
Be careful what mood you’re in when you watch it, though, because I watched it at a somewhat dark point, and it pushed me over the edge out into something resembling a depression, that took me three days in the sun with Lamb and The Shins to get rid of.

Posts
I remember loving this movie in the theatre, but I doubt I’d have gone all to the ten with it. Maaybe 9,5. Still, damned good, that’s for certain. I loved the ending.
11. May 2008 @ 19:38 ( Permalink )
I’ll have to do a rewatch of this. It’s been years since I first watched, and I can’t remember anything about it, really. Certainly not that it was worth a 10/10.
I hope I’m wrong, though.
11. May 2008 @ 21:00 ( Permalink )
It’s no 10/10, however, it WAS really good, honestly, I remember I was impressed. But I get that it’s a very Terje-movie, more so than it fits us, I think, and thus it stands to reason that a movie I remember as “a strong 9 that Terje’d probably like” would be a 10 to him.
12. May 2008 @ 01:07 ( Permalink )
Also, you people seem to have insane standards as to what constitutes a perfect 10 movie.
But yeah, it’s an extremely Terje movie.
12. May 2008 @ 10:30 ( Permalink )
(Please note that my use of the word “perfect” here is dumb; perfection is obviously a concept I don’t believe in, and as such I use the word that designates it to describe things that are “merely” extremely good.)
12. May 2008 @ 10:32 ( Permalink )
Insane standars? Heck no. “Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: Extended Edition”, sir.
12. May 2008 @ 11:57 ( Permalink )
Blade Runner, Platoon, The Lord of the Rings, Extended Editions 1-2-3 (can’t differentiate the grades between them, but I like the first one best) and the book itself of course, Donnie Darko, Requiem For a Dream, “Catch-22″ (the book), BSG seasons 1-2 and Deadwood (season 1) are the films/books/shows that have or would receive the honour of a perfect score. I’m sure I’m forgetting a couple of goodies, but that’s what I came up with.
It does appear to be a rather exclusive club of awesomeness, which is exactly how I prefer it.
13. May 2008 @ 18:36 ( Permalink )
Deadwood season 1? I take it you haven’t watched the other two, then? Because I don’t think the show got weaker.
Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven’t seen/read.
LotR extended editions…. I’ll give a six on the dice to all three sure. As well as to the cinematic editions of FotR and probably RoK. But I’d not give all three 10/10. I’d probably end up with 10, 9.5 and 9.5 for the EE’s and 10, 8.5 and 9.5 for the cinematic versions.
Blade Runner I’ve no idea what’s up with. Everybody seems to see some form of brilliance in it that just passes me by somehow. I feel like I’m losing out on something - I’d give that movie 7/10 at most, and even that’d feel generous.
BSG season 1, if I’d be able to grade tv-shows like that, I think I’d have given 9 or 9.5 , but not 10. Season 2, however, might have gotten there. I’d have to do a rewatch to be sure, though, seasons 1 and 2 blend a lot together in my head.
13. May 2008 @ 21:23 ( Permalink )
I haven’t gotten around to season 3 of Deadwood. It’s been on hold for a couple of months now; will probably watch it in the summer. Season 2 got a strong 9,5/10 or somesuch on the blog.
“Platoon, Donnie Darko, Requiem for a Dream, and Catch 22 I haven’t seen/read.”
I envy you.
As for LotR, well, I have trouble grading much between them because they’re actually one gigantic film cut into three pieces. Yeah, I could probably say that FotR > RotK > tTT, but in my mind their worth a combined 10/10, which is easier anyhow. I don’t grade the book for each individual book, even though I easily could, because they weren’t meant to be read like that by Tolkien, and it feels unnatural to do so.
Not everyone likes Blade Runner - and it IS too slow - but I have a hard time understanding such freakish sentiments. I watched it three times in a row (granted though that I was actually writing an analysis of it at the time), and it got better by each viewing.
BSG re-watch? Now THERE’S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it’s ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes…
Btw, Terje - I really hope you got around to the last episode of season 3 before you read the last SFX magazine. They had printed an epic spoiler in gigantic letters on the interview with Tigh.
13. May 2008 @ 22:05 ( Permalink )
Deadwood season 3 was probably a little bit weaker than the other two in my book, now that I think on it, but only marginally so. Then again, I think I preferred the second one to the first one, so what do I know… They’re all awesome anyway. If you like them, by the way, you should probably check out The Wire at some point.
The LotR EE, I’d like to mention, since they’re brought up, do very different things in the three movies, if you ask me. With FotR, it makes it more nuanced and in-depth and brings the movie even closer to the book, and makes an excellent movie pretty damned close to perfect. With tTT, instead, it makes a rather heavy movie a little lighter, giving us more character-moments and breathing-air between the major scenes, which makes for a vast improvement over the somewhat less than excellent (though still very good) cinematic version. And with RoK, the EE disappointed me. Adding to the immense stupidity of the skull-avalanche and its ilk, I mostly felt like the RotK-extended cut just added scenes to the movie, making it longer but not necessarily better or worse. Which is too bad. If it had been a refinement like FotR’s or an improvement like tTT’s, it would have med RoK EE the best movie of them all. As it was, I felt like I got more or less the same out of watching the cinematic release, sadly. Of course, the cinematic release was superb, but still.
“BSG re-watch? Now THERE’S a thought. Maybe so it coincided it’s ending with the last episode of season 4? Yes…”
The man’s a genious. I’d like to do that. Ohyes. Probably won’t, but man would I like to.
(And Amras, if he’s more up to date on reading magazines about tv-shows than he is on the shows themselves, then he is a bloody buffoon and asking for it.)
13. May 2008 @ 23:01 ( Permalink )