So, I’ve been reading Ultimate Spider-Man lately (bye-bye, decent exam-period meals), and at first I thought it would be boring to read a superhero comic with only one superhero. I imagined it would be far less interesting than the more group-oriented superhero comics I’ve read before, like Astonishing and Ultimate X-Men and The Ultimates, as there wouldn’t be as much character interaction. Man, was I wrong.
Thing is, obviously (hindsight is, and so on…), that the plethora of characters in especially Ultimate X-Men (the one I’ve read the most of) didn”t really facilitate character interaction at all. For that it was too action-y, but more importantly, each character required so much time to be established, there weren’t really any time for depth. It was all shallow width. The fact that it was (is; I always forget that the things isn’t closed down just yet) written by an almost as confusing plethora of writers, none of whom stayed with the comic for longer periods of time, and none of whom seemed to care too much about continuity, about taking into account previous plot and character arcs. They cared about it, sure, but not much. And so, you get stuff like several hardcover collections where nothing memorable really happens. The X-Men fight some generic Marvel bad guy, they have some minor internal drama, and that’s it. Minimal progress. Then, of course, there’s the abhorrent Beast incident. Sigh.
Ultimate Spider-Man, on the other hand, is written pretty much by the same guy. I seem to remember hearing or reading that Bendis left at one point, but he’s stayed on for the first seven trade paperbacks so far (that’s how far I’ve read), and I imagine he’ll be around for at least a couple more. So if we overlook some minor elements, like how Eddie Brock is a middle-aged journalist in the Doc Ock storyline, then becomes a young student and childhood friend of Peter Parker in the Venom arc, the continuity’s great. This is especially true for the character arcs, which soundly disproves my ridiculous fantasy about there being less character interaction in single-hero comis. There might not be more, but the limited population, so to speak, allows the writer to flesh out his characters, and thus create both proper background for real, touching character interaction, of a whole differne scope than in Ultimate X-Men, and to create scenes like the closing one in TPB #7, where Aunt May goes to see her therapist.
So, in conclusion, a big, hearty “thank you!” to Loki for getting me hooked on this stuff, and a mental memo to myself to remind myself to read Ultimate X-Men again this summer, as I feel like my presentation of the series here is a wee bit too harsh.
Well, I’m off to see how Spidey fares with Black Cat and Electra. Ciao! ![]()

Posts
I’m struck by a vague thought about that whole classical “unity of location and time”, too, I think, but I can’t really get a strong enough grip on it to put it into words…
25. May 2008 @ 22:14 ( Permalink )
Bendis is The Man, true. Or at least One Of The Men. What I’m saying is he is A Man, one of the few with an option on the determinate article.
“written by an almost as confusing plethora of writers, none of whom stayed with the comic for longer periods of time,”
Meeep, wrong. Mark Millar stayed on for six volumes, only one less than you’ve read Bendis’ on Spidey so long. Then, agreed, a little upheaval as Bendis wrote only two volumes - but let’s face it, Bendis rocks, so those volumes are actually among the series’ best ones. Then Brian K. Vaughan steps in with a lot of volumes by a single writer again - five of them. Last, Robert Kirkman has been on the series - and still is - and has so far written five volumes himself.
So yes, a bit more confusing than Spidey’s “Bendis, Bendis, Bendis”, but it’s not like they tossed it around every year or anything. Your arguments against it story-wise are totally valid (and I agree), but the writers aren’t as many and short between as you seem to think. Also note that Bendis and Millar are responsible for a lot of other Ultimate-stuff, and they together wrote the first eight volumes, which (at least up until that point) ensured a rather good shared continuity with especially “The Ultimates” and “Ultimate Spider-man”.
On “Ultimate Spider-man”, by the way, as far as I know, there’s never been another writer than Bendis. They changed artist once, that’s it as far as I know.
I’m currently at volume 15, by the way, so at this rate you’ll be catching up in no-time.
26. May 2008 @ 11:53 ( Permalink )
Thanks for clearing that up for me, Loki.
“I’m currently at volume 15, by the way, so at this rate you’ll be catching up in no-time.”
Perhaps. I’m about to start on volume 10 now, but I’ve yet to lay my grubby little hands on volumes 15, 17 and 18, so unless Avalon or Outland have them in stock one of the two times I intend to go downtown before going home for the summer, I probably won’t for a while.
Unless, of course, I go tomorrow, and ask the guy at Avalon if he’d be willing to order the three I’m lacking for me…
(Obviously, the easiest way to get a hold of them is to go via Amazon, but I kinda like supporting my local comics and fantasy shops, especially Avalon, as they’re usually empty of other costumers every time I’m in there…)
((Also, it just struck me that “costumers” sounds kinda like “people who make costumes”, alternatively “people who wears costumes”. Huh.))
1. June 2008 @ 15:58 ( Permalink )
((That’s because it’s supposed to be “customers”, not “costumers”))
Glad to hear (well, see it implied) that you still like the books. ^^
2. June 2008 @ 01:10 ( Permalink )
((Whoa, that was dimwitted of me, even by my regular standards. When I mess up on this basic English, I shudder to think how I’ll do on my English Linguistics exam on Thursday…
))
2. June 2008 @ 20:53 ( Permalink )
((Er… best of luck?))
2. June 2008 @ 22:32 ( Permalink )
Well, I don’t know about you guys, but I ALWAYS put on my red cape and spandex suit before I go shopping. Call it a ritual.
2. June 2008 @ 23:06 ( Permalink )
…Are you… SPAMMING?
2. June 2008 @ 23:21 ( Permalink )
You dastardly villain you!
7. June 2008 @ 13:36 ( Permalink )