1952.
186 pages.
Gollancz SF Masterworks paperback (2003).
In the 22nd century the people’s representatives in the American legislature have been replaced by those of the corporations, who in their turn are the clients of a few big, competing advertisement companies whose only concern is Sales. The citizens are no longer that; they are exclusively consumers, conditioned to unthinking consumerism by the ad firms, and awarded limited rights according to their place in the hierarchy of production — a hierarchy 19th century socialists would have recognised and raised their hackles at.
Mitchell Courtenay is close to the top. He is a starlet copywriter at Schocken Associates, one of America’s two largest ad companies, and his company’s latest contract is bound to secure his position for life. It has been decided that humankind is ready to colonise another planet, and the lucky celestial body is Venus. Naturally, the planet’s an inferno, and no one in their right mind would go there voluntarily. The expertise of the advertisement industry is needed, and when Schocken wins the contract to promote Venus as a paradise, Mitch is put in charge of the Venus Project. However, it does not take long for things to begin going awry, and Mitch suspects sabotage, either by Schocken’s fiercest competitor, or by the underground terrorist network of the environmentalist Consies. He initiates an investigation, but before he gets very far with it even more goes awry and hilarity ensues. (At least if you think kinda horrible stuff is funny; we cater to the loonies here at Thus Spoketh today.)
The Space Merchants is supposedly the best example of the 1950s social science fiction. Rather than being overly concerned with technological developments and how these might impact human life, the authors try to imagine how a future where commercialism has been taken to its limits might look, and what this might have done to our societies. They do so without straying out into the realms of the dystopia, at least not the most extreme areas, as the society (or rather the world; while the action is centred mainly in and around the US, we get the occasional hint at what has happened elsewhere, too, particularly India) depicted is far from all bad. It might be fundamentally wrong and not too attractive for most people today, but it is still pretty far from for instance the totalitarian dystopias of George Orwell or Aldous Huxley.
It’s not a very well-paced novel, though. The first seventy pages or so, where we’re following Mitch around his work on the Venus Project, was very close to being just a long yawn. The plot got vastly more interesting as soon as things started to go wrong, though, as they’re wont to do, and the middle part of the novel was quite enjoyable. Of course, the main character mostly acted like a vain, ignorant fool who only had knowledge about advertisement (he did know that, though; the parts where he was planning the ad campaign of the Venus Project was actually fun), but I guess that’s how it’s supposed really, and that the only readers who expect otherwise are us numbnuts too used to the tropes of the various kinds of heroic fantasy. It was a bit worse that almost all the characters seemed so shallow as to be almost transparent, but really, how much time can be devoted to fleshing out supporting characters when you’re trying to squeeze a novel in in under 200 pages, eh?
To do a bit of summing-up, I assume I might recommend this novel to anyone either interested in the social science fiction of the 1950s or just curious about the genre. Casual readers might not get all that much out of this, in other words, but overall, I believe the cover blurbs just might have been right about this being one of the best social science fiction novels of the 1950s. (And boy, do I wish I’d been up to thinking of some way of avoiding to use that phrase twice in two sentences.)
6.0/10
(I have to say, though, that I bought this novel primarily because I thought the title to be hilariously camp, and that I had no expectations to it whatsoever. As such, it was quite the pleasant surprise.)

Posts
Nice to see you posting again, even IF it is one catering to loonies.
13. October 2008 @ 23:41 ( Permalink )
Wasn’t this one posted a while ago, or was that a totally different Pohl novel that also featured a nifty cover?
14. October 2008 @ 21:06 ( Permalink )
Can’t have been; I haven’t read anything by Pohl before. (Also, I just finished writing the review approximately 30 seconds before I posted it…)
However, most of the covers of the Gollancz SF Masterworks series are crap (while surprisingly few of the Fantasy variety are…), so that could have been one of them. Or it could, if I’d read any more than just this one and The Dispossessed.
I do buy a relatively large number of books based on their covers, though.
15. October 2008 @ 22:31 ( Permalink )
Hmm…
*searches*
Ah, yes! I must’ve confused it with our little chat in the Neuropath thread. Good to see that the mad cow hasn’t progressed too much, then
16. October 2008 @ 19:02 ( Permalink )
Yeah, ‘m sure that’s a relief to you.
By the way, I’m currently about halfway through Paul Anderson’s “The Broken Sword”, which so far seems like a mix of old Norse heroic sagas and Wolfe’s “The Wizard-Knight”. I hope to finish it while in Rome (yeah, as if I’m gonna have the time *there*!), where I also plan on getting started on Dave Duncan’s Tales of the King’s Blades series — of which I’ve heard a lot of good. What’s the word on the grapevine on that these days, by the way?
You reading anything fun?
18. October 2008 @ 11:38 ( Permalink )
(Oh, and I’m gonna check out your blogs before I leave tomorrow.)
18. October 2008 @ 11:39 ( Permalink )
Yay for comments!
18. October 2008 @ 14:09 ( Permalink )
Indeed!
18. October 2008 @ 14:12 ( Permalink )
I find that my best reading is done on plains or at airports (assuming I’m alone, that is), so it’s not an entirely insane proposition. “The Broken Sword” is also a big, BIG classic that I’ve meant to get around to. It’s Richard Morgan’s favourite fantasy novel (and supposedly - and surprisingly! - a lot like “The Steel Remains”…), and he was one of the authors who pused Lynch the hardest. Dave Duncan is a middling author on the web in terms of popularity. It’ll be fun to see what you think of him.
Me? Oh, some here, some there. I was pleasently surprised by Joss Whedon’s “Astonishing X-Men” collection; lot’s of fun dialgoue, greath character work and some fun plots (especially “Danger” sine “Gifted” smacked too much of the X-Men: The Last Stand. Or, perhaps it’s more precise to say that it was the other way around). Ellis’ newest Thunderbolts tpb, “Caged Angels” was also quite superb and I’m sad he didn’t stay on that book, ’cause he was doing great work on it.
On the book front, I’m trying to tear into a book called “Sharp Teeth” by Toby Barlow. It’s an urban fantasy novel about werewolves, but with the twist of not being written in prose, but solely in verse. The first chapter was quite engrossing and it’s gotten very good reviews, so I remain optimistic. If that fails, however, I’m going to read the second Gerard Hunter novel by Sapkowski, “Blood of Elves” and I’m also required to read “Landstrykere” by Hamsun for a school thingie. Hamsun’s “Markens Grøde” was teh hawesome, so hopefully this matches up to that standard.
And today I got my new, shiny, sparkingly fantastic Playstation 3 with Star Wars: The Force Unleased as my first obstacle. The Force Grip is surprisingly much fun to do
18. October 2008 @ 17:56 ( Permalink )
On plains, huh? Fond of the great, wide open outdoors, are ya?
“(especially “Danger” sine “Gifted” smacked too much of the X-Men: The Last Stand. Or, perhaps it’s more precise to say that it was the other way around)”
It is.
18. October 2008 @ 18:05 ( Permalink )
You can take a cowboy out of the West, but you can’t take the cowboy out of a man
18. October 2008 @ 19:03 ( Permalink )
“I find that my best reading is done on plains or at airports (assuming I’m alone, that is), so it’s not an entirely insane proposition.”
The last time I was on a plane I was 16, was reading The Eye of the World for the first time, and had what must have been my first man-cold, so I wouldn’t really know if this is the case for me, too. Hoping it is, though, although I plan on focusing on Loki’s “Jakt” manuscript and the three or four Economists I’ve neglected on the plane.
““The Broken Sword” is also a big, BIG classic that I’ve meant to get around to. It’s Richard Morgan’s favourite fantasy novel (and supposedly - and surprisingly! - a lot like “The Steel Remains”…), and he was one of the authors who pused Lynch the hardest.”
It’s that much of a classic? I have to find myself a new fantasy forum, because I was actually not aware of that. Not sure if I would have guessed it, either, from the first 100 pages or so…
“Hamsun’s “Markens Grøde” was teh hawesome, so hopefully this matches up to that standard.”
Good to hear that you like Hamsun and “Markens Grøde”; personally, I can’t stand either the man nor the novel. Tried to read it once, in high school’s third grade, and had to give up after thirty or fourty pages…
18. October 2008 @ 23:49 ( Permalink )
Yay! I’m gonna be READ. Or, my silly dribble is, anyway.
19. October 2008 @ 00:00 ( Permalink )
If it’s just silly dribble, I’m not sure I’m gonna bother…
19. October 2008 @ 00:49 ( Permalink )
Donae worry, the silliest dribble is in another file entirely. It’s entitled “Visiting Writer” and is a horrid, horrid piece of fiction where me and three other people write small sections of text on whims and then send it back to the other three. I believe we might have reached twenty protagonists by now. It’s been going on on and off for quite a few years.
19. October 2008 @ 01:53 ( Permalink )
“Good to hear that you like Hamsun and “Markens Grøde”; personally, I can’t stand either the man nor the novel. Tried to read it once, in high school’s third grade, and had to give up after thirty or fourty pages…”
Heresy! I loved that book and have been known to the “ditt kreatur!” ever since. You get a whole new appreciation for potatoes after reading it, too
“Loki’s “Jakt” manuscript and the three or four Economists I’ve neglected on the plane.”
Damnit, totally forgot about that. Can I postpone my reviews till Christmas? Seeing as I spent two-three hours per chapter during the summer…
19. October 2008 @ 11:27 ( Permalink )
*known to utter “ditt kreatur”
19. October 2008 @ 11:28 ( Permalink )
You asking me? Heck, I’ll be happy to get any feedback at all, not too picky as to timing.
19. October 2008 @ 12:37 ( Permalink )
“You asking me? Heck, I’ll be happy to get any feedback at all, not too picky as to timing.”
Awesome, because I kinda got somewhat captivated by Dave Duncan’s “The Gilded Chain” while I was in Rome, and have been toiling with assignments and reading ever since I got back…
(I did find the time for one chapter, though, so there is at least some progress. Progress that could have been severely outdistanced by any half-dead slug, perhaps, but progress still…)
10. November 2008 @ 16:36 ( Permalink )
Have no fear, old chap. I find that in so many of the versatile multitudes of different walks and aspects of life, there is the common denominator of half-dead slugs being quite severely underrated.
10. November 2008 @ 19:58 ( Permalink )