Kinda had to watch this, didn’t I? Not only is it one of this summers big blockbusters - it’s a blockbustin’ sci-fi movie, which always makes me want to rent it even though I know it’s gonna be bad.
This picture pretty much covers what I’ll be remembering from “Transformers”. It’s not the robots or the wild action scenes; it’s that Megan Fox is hawt beyond belief. Come get your eye candy, boys, cos you ain’t finding anything sweeter than her in this flick.
As for the plot, well… It’s your normal “Boy buys car. Car turns out to be an alien robot that can transform (wooot!) itself. Alien robots starts to fight other, albeit evil, alien robots while the characters competes in who can deliver the cheesiest line of all. Oh, and the boy who bought the rad car with the robotic coolness has a love interest who’s way hotter than him, but since girls like boys with big robots (*scribbles down that idea for future benefit*), she ends up jumping him anyways. Cue inspirational music and clichéd ending, and you’re done.”
If you feel like I’ve spoiled your experience by writing this plot description, I’ll promise you here and now that I’ve done no such thing. You don’t watch these kind of movies for their plots or characters or dialog or… Heck, I don’t know why I watch ‘em anymore. Maybe it’s a society thing - everyone goes to see the new James Bond movie even though the critics gives it a 3 while implying that if it didn’t have a cute Bond girl and cool gadgets he’d rather watch the grass grow on his front lawn (this doesn’t apply to “Casino Royal”, which was simply awesome).
So if you like cheesy movies with cool special effects and two hot chicks, go watch “Transformers”. If you like movies that are so riddled with logical flaws and bad storytelling that a monkey without a brain could tell you have it’s going to go down, go watch “Transformers”. Personally I’d rather watch that picture of Megan Fox leaning over the car for a couple of seconds and save myself the money. At least I didn’t grow bored while watching it, and I’ll readily admit to have seen worse movies. But then again, there ain’t much that bores me if I have a bucket of popcorn to keep me company.
3 /10
Posts
*looks at picture*
*doesn’t really see what all the fuss the adolescent blogger is making is all about*
So she’s skinny and looks attractively woman-shaped when standing in suggestive positions. This seperates her from the other 90% of Hollywood female stars her age how?
12. December 2007 @ 14:31 ( Permalink )
Every guy knows that if something is pleasing to the eye, you don’t go complaining that it ain’t all that special when you come down to it. It doesn’t need to be special. I like ‘em when they’re “skinny and looks attractively woman-shaped when standing in suggestive positions”. After all - that’s her job, and she’s remarkably good at it.
13. December 2007 @ 10:43 ( Permalink )
M-hm. *eyeroll* You keep making me want to quote Blackadder to a certain Mr. Pitt with these posts of yours…
(You do realize that you could probably find other women matching that description but looking better by simply googling for it, right? I’m just having a hard time seeing how something you can get as well/better for free elsewhere is something to get this excited about… Seems a little bit like going to the circus and coming back immensely thrilled that they sold very expensive chocolate there but kinda meh about everything else.)
13. December 2007 @ 10:52 ( Permalink )
Even when my point is that it’s better to at least have found a good chocolate when you were stupid enough to go the circus?
13. December 2007 @ 11:19 ( Permalink )
Ah. Okay. That’s a valid point.
Still rather odd to spend so much time and energy on praising that chocolate, though.
13. December 2007 @ 15:42 ( Permalink )