‘Hellboy’ is a gob-smackingly brilliant superhero movie right from the first scene till the very end. I loved it, and it will down in history as a ‘how-to-do-it’ guide for movie-makers trying to break through in a very capitalistic industry that seems to have mostly forgotten why people loved films to begin with. Do yourself the biggest favour of your life:
Read the rest of this review.
Because none of what I’ve said so far has been remotely true, indeed it’s all been a big fat lie. ‘Hellboy’ is as far from the first paragraph as the North Pole is from being inhabited by penguins who just happen to enjoy dressing up in gorilla suits.
In even blunter terms: ‘Hellboy’. Is. A. Shitty. Film.
(This is a slightly spoilerish review, so if you’re planning on watching this movie, I’d recommend you through that foolish notion out the proverbial window and let me tell you why ‘Hellboy’ isn’t worth your time. Trust me, it’s in your own best interest)

Describing the plot of this movie is easy since it’s so generic that a three-year old could’ve predicted the entire story after watching the first five minutes: Nazi Germany is losing and they need some new allies. But these puny humans have proved so Got Verdamt ineffectual that a real live demon should work out a lot better. Sadly though, the only place they can open the portal to the underworld is somewhere in Great Britain, and they are naturally discovered and stopped, but not before a red little thing has managed to claw its way through to our world.
Enter Hellboy , a freakishly strong devil-shaped demon who fights the good fight in the employ of the US government. His main task is to stop other supernatural things from messing up our daily lives, though he also enjoys acting like an emo teenager and eating fiendishly huge amounts of fast-food, all of which everyone finds hugely entertaining. His sidekick is Abe Sapien (or ‘The Fish Guy’ as I aptly nicknamed him with my awesome imagination), and he’s also got a psychotically and.. ahem, pyrotechnically troubled love interest, whom I thought of as ‘Crazy Fire Girl’ (yes, even I am astounded at myself at this point).
But Nazi Germany isn’t dead!
(…)
Well okay, Nazi Germany is dead, but that doesn’t mean it can’t spring a nasty, let’s-end-the-world plot from beyond the grave!
(…)
Or rather, their formerly employd evil witch doctor/dark lord wizard type can do it with the help of a blonde-haired Nazi-groupie and a seemingly unstoppable kung-fu fighting mummy-assassin!
But enough about all that! Surely there are some good things to say about ‘Hellboy’?
Well, if you insist… I did actually enjoy one thing about all this, and that was the way this film was shot. The composition was lovely, and made the most out of their scarce resources. Hell, Hellboy himself, who does indeed look terribly stupid in his big, red costume, was shot in a manner that nearly didn’t make him look ridiculous. Frankly, I was more than shocked how much ‘Hellboy’ sucked compared to “Pan’s Labyrinth”, which I personally think is one of the best films made on this side of the noughties. I can spot some similarities in the between the two, but those are mainly technical, and not story-telling wise.
The acting is generally tiresomely mediocre and more often than not it threatens to become downright bad, though I’ll grant that the poorly written dialogue should get an equal measure of the blame as the poor people who tried to make the best out of it. Even the designed ‘cool-guy’ lines that Hellboy sputtered out at predictable intervals weren’t especially cool, and after ‘the first act’ of the movie was done, I kind of zoned out the build-up to the climax while I imagined what this film would be like if Joss Whedon’s “Spike” had gotten the lead in such a film. That’d easily be much more watchable than this piece of crap.
So, to sum up: ‘Hellboy’ has only a single redeeming factor, and that’s the fact that this film doesn’t look like a stinking turd, even though it clearly is… However, I’m thoroughly intrigued to see whether ‘Hellboy 2: The Golden Army” is as much of an improvement as I think (or hope) it’s going to be.
At least it won’t be worse than this.
2.5/10

Posts
Frack. I remember feeling it sucked tremendously exiting the theatre, but I’ve kind of always hoped I just remember all the bad bits at the expense of the good…
…apparently not. Still, I have a gut-feeling the sequel will be far superior to it as well. (It kinda can’t not, right?)
I especially remember feeling the climax of the movie sucked insanely. That up until that point, the movie’d been somewhat redeemable if it had an awesome ending, but then it had some bullshit with tentacles instead.
22. April 2008 @ 14:01 ( Permalink )
Yes, because I did feel like it could’ve been passable if they’d thrown out the script and done nearly everything different
And with a second movie you don’t have to spend time setting up the characters, and that’s always an advantage.
The ending was everything you expected it to be and everything you sincerely hoped it wasn’t. “Cringeworthy” isn’t a word as far as I know, but it does seem apt to describe this entire crapfest.
22. April 2008 @ 14:15 ( Permalink )
“The ending was everything you expected it to be and everything you sincerely hoped it wasn’t.”
Exactly. I can’t even remember what the ending WAS anymore, but I remember feeling that about it.
22. April 2008 @ 14:18 ( Permalink )
Umm, it ended with Rasputin trying to bring Ctuhlu into this world; how is that not cool?
Can’t say I agree with your review. The only thing that really bugged me anout the movie was that it gave way too much screentime to Sammael, in relation to how important he/it was to the plot.
Beyond that, I thought it was a decent movie. Nothing special, perhaps, but far from bad, or even mediocre. Unfortunately, I watched it during a time when I was a bit tardy with the reviews, so it didn’t get more than a couple of sentences of mention on my blog, but I think it’s fully on par with stuff like, say, Fantastic Four, Underworld and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Neither which are Great, of course, but they’re all servicable, entertaining little flicks.
24. April 2008 @ 12:03 ( Permalink )
In other words, somewhere in the area of 6.5.
24. April 2008 @ 12:07 ( Permalink )
It _might_ get close to being on par with FF, though I have to say, I felt that while the plot of FF was rather lame and boring, they did the characters and the individual scenes well enough. I think that, as far as I’d recall, I’d put both Underworld and League well above it though. Especially League. Don’t get what everybody has against that movie.
24. April 2008 @ 12:09 ( Permalink )
Yes, it was indeed on par with the first FF and League, two films that I thought were _poor_ (though I’m gearing up to do a re-watch of League since it’s been so long since I watched it in the cinema). I rather enjoyed the two Underworld movies, but that may have as much with Kate Beckinsale as anything else.
25. April 2008 @ 00:44 ( Permalink )
Kate Beckinsale? THOSE MOVIES HAD BILL NIGHY.
25. April 2008 @ 03:18 ( Permalink )
Kate BECKINSALE was clad in BODY-TIGHT LEATHER.
I’m herewith withdrawing your male-license, thus forcing you to live an empty and androgynous life.
25. April 2008 @ 12:56 ( Permalink )
You can see Kate Beckinsale in body-tight leather by googling or youtubing her whenever you’d like. Bill NIghy as the Awesome Vampire Who Was Cleverer And Nastier Than All Other Vampires is only to be seen if you watch both movies of “Underworld” in their fullness.
25. April 2008 @ 14:19 ( Permalink )
Also, I don’t have a male-license. I’m black-market male.
25. April 2008 @ 14:19 ( Permalink )
I’m not saying that I didn’t think Bill Nighy wasn’t awesome.
I’m just saying that if I watch a film with one of the most gorgeous women on the face of the Earth, prancing around in body-tight leather and kicking ass while she’s doing it, my Manly Brain ™ would prioritize her over ANYTHING. ‘Underworld’ could’ve contained a scene with Joss Whedon and Hugh Laurie yodeling their hearts out, and I STILL wouldn’t mention that over Beckinsale.
26. April 2008 @ 08:21 ( Permalink )
You’re NOT saying that you did NOT think that Bill Nighy was NOT awesome.
So you’re not saying that you did think that Bill NIgh was awesome.
So you’re saying that you thought he wasn’t, then.
(Just working my way through your triple negative)
To your latter paragraph, I don’t think that I’m not going to abstain from deigning to comment.
26. April 2008 @ 08:39 ( Permalink )
*Nighy
26. April 2008 @ 08:40 ( Permalink )