I like my shows smart, and I like it when the shows think that the viewer is smart, too. I like my dialogue quick, witty and, of course, funny. The characters should be well-developed, yet still quite mysterious so that you still want to learn more about ‘em. If you’ve got all those ingredients and manage to add some story arcs and inventive episode plots, then I’m generally a happy monkey.
Which is probably why I’m bananas about “The West Wing”.
No? Too easy, perhaps?
Well, my point remains the same: This is a fantastic TV-series.

When you’ve got a show named “The West Wing”, you would think that the premise was quite self-explanatory. Add that this was one of the most successful drama series at
its time, and the need for a long winding introduction shrinks further still. But for those of you who weren’t around when this was airing, I’ll let you know that the show deals with the life and intrigues of the White House. The central characters are the Senior Staff (finely featured above), and while the President is of course the most important character, he is by no means the one with the most face-time.
Now, I originally planned to review every single season of “The West Wing”, but these seasons were so closely matched in terms of quality and style that I opted for writing just the one review. Also, I had severe problems of giving myself the time to write anything after the cliffhanger-ending of the first season, and have to admit that I’m nearly half-way through the third as I write this. Yeah, this is one unhealthily addictive series, but who’s to blame for this brilliance?
Well, Aaron Sorkin (”Charlie Wilson’s War”, “Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip”) is, obviously. The guy’s quite simply a genius when it comes to making good TV-shows, and he’s easily among my favourite show-runners, only nudged out by Joss Whedon (mostly for “Firefly” and “Buffy”). I think Aaron Sorkin is the best dialogue writer in the business, and with “the West Wing” he fashioned a vehicle where his talents can truly shine. The first season is a twenty-two episode fist-pump of sheer quality, and the second isn’t far behind, but does sometimes lack a little originality and could have done with some new faces. The characters are also well-rounded and believable, even if it is a bit startling that everyone on the staff are so quick-witted. My favourite character is the Media Communication Director, Toby Ziegler, who’s really isn’t what you’d call a people’s person. He doesn’t have a lot charisma, and he’s bitter, but he always does what he believes in and tries to the Right Thing.
I actually found this show to be so good that the only thing I could think of complaining about was the music (too much pathos for my taste). That’s some achievement, huh? I could also make some grunting noises about there not being a lot of strong female characters, aside from C.J., in the central cast, and the ones that do exist are either lawyers or assistants, but… isn’t that the way it is over there? And it’s not like the show’s is misogynist or anything like that, so I don’t think it’s fair to make a fuss about something that really isn’t an issue.
It’s refreshing to watch a show that actually finds real issues more important than dealing with the odd burgeoning office romance. It’s also very refreshing to imagine a world where the president of the United States isn’t a total douchebag and where the people around him try to the best they can. They don’t always achieve it, and sometimes they have to give in to the system, but it gives me a little hope when a liberal (in American terms, of course) show like this can survive seven seasons on the air.
Season 1: 10/10
Season 2: 9.0/10 (strong)

Posts
It’s truly awesome. What’s the most impressive about The West Wing, though, to me, is the pilot. Which is probably one of, if not THE, best pilot I’ve ever seen.
I might give a more comprehensive comment on the morrow, if I feel like it, as I’ll have more time on my hands then. If I don’t, just know I appreciated reading this review and I’m looking forward to hearing your comments on the rest of the show.
14. July 2008 @ 12:23 ( Permalink )
I’m a fan of the first two seasons as well (and the first was better than the second)…the series goes down in quality a bit after that, but it’s still well worthwhile. Nice review Amras.
14. July 2008 @ 15:31 ( Permalink )
I’d say the series takes a stoop in quality but comes back strongly in the last two seasons, finding its footing again in season 6 and really doing well in season 7 which I’d say was as least as good as season 2.
14. July 2008 @ 15:52 ( Permalink )
Woohoo! I remember a smart ass little brother throwing comment’s at me while enjoying this show a couple of years back. Good to see you’ve grown!
18. July 2008 @ 09:45 ( Permalink )
Grown? Me?
What an outrageous accusation!
18. July 2008 @ 09:49 ( Permalink )
Did the comment’s at me hurt? Where did he hit you with it?
(I, most certainly, have not grown.)
18. July 2008 @ 10:03 ( Permalink )
I mostly aim them at people’s ego’s.
Amras - promoting genitive solidarity wherever he goes!
18. July 2008 @ 10:08 ( Permalink )
Dude, do that in an actual post and lose a reader. XD
18. July 2008 @ 10:08 ( Permalink )
That implies that someone actually reads my posts and doesn’t just skim them till they reach the rating.
Aside from you stalkerish types
18. July 2008 @ 10:13 ( Permalink )
Me skims. :p
18. July 2008 @ 10:16 ( Permalink )
I did indeed mean that you’d lose one of us stalkerish types.
18. July 2008 @ 10:17 ( Permalink )
I question your dedication.
18. July 2008 @ 10:21 ( Permalink )
My dedication is quite immense, it’s just to proper grammar and spelling rather than to random online acquaintances, no matter how nice or pleasant they might be to keep around.
18. July 2008 @ 10:24 ( Permalink )
I actually agree with that sentiment. Genitive abuse is a sin that gets you a place in that special kind of hell where excessive users of exclamation and quotation marks also reside.
18. July 2008 @ 10:31 ( Permalink )
Those, and snotty dentists. (Because really, that’s not cool.)
18. July 2008 @ 10:34 ( Permalink )
Especially if they’re snotty in more than one respect (because really, that’s downright unhealthy).
18. July 2008 @ 10:41 ( Permalink )
That was indeed my general meaning and drift.
18. July 2008 @ 10:42 ( Permalink )
“Genitive abuse is a sin that gets you a place in that special kind of hell where excessive users of exclamation and quotation marks also reside.”
That kinda sucks for you, then, as you never seem to get the genitive of “it” right.
18. July 2008 @ 14:32 ( Permalink )
Oooh, burn!
(In his defense, that one’s easy to misspell even though you know the difference because of them being homonyms. I do it all the time - though I think I usually catch it before I click “submit” of anything, as I’m rather aware of it.)
19. July 2008 @ 04:51 ( Permalink )
Yes, but I do it sarcastically, so that I can learn to hate genitive abusers BETTER.
19. July 2008 @ 11:20 ( Permalink )
Really? Hate them _better_? Not more or in a fashion more intense or deep-seeded, but _better_? How, pray tell, would you describe the variable quality of hatred?
19. July 2008 @ 12:25 ( Permalink )
It has everything to do with how effectively you can hate someone/something. If you spend a lot of time hating a thing and not accurately expressing it with the same intensity, you can learn to hate it better.
19. July 2008 @ 13:23 ( Permalink )
Ah, I see.
Bloody industrialist bullshit.
19. July 2008 @ 15:12 ( Permalink )
(Ohhh, how inefficiently I hate them bloody industrialists and their bullshit!)
19. July 2008 @ 15:12 ( Permalink )