I have a confession to make: I don’t know anything about Dan Ronco, nor had I heard anything about “Unholy Domain” before the author sent me an e-mail, asking if I’d be interested in reading and perhaps reviewing it here on my blog. Me, being the book-loving guy that I am, said, “Yes, please!”, and then I forgot all about it ’till it suddenly appeared in my mailbox. I did some research and discovered that this sci-fi novel was probably right up my alley. The blurbs compared Ronco to a certain Phillip K. Dick and the word on the web seemed pretty good. There was only one thing left to do and that was to read and find out for myself.
Which I’ve now done (obviously), and for all its faults, I found it to be an interesting read.

“Unholy Domain” is a thoroughbred sci-fi thriller set in the year of 2022. Our world has unfortunately taken a turn for the worse after a devastating computer virus named PeaceMaker was released, causing the world’s computers to seize up and effectively shut down… well, everything, really. Millions of people died as a consequence and the world economy went down with them when the American and several other governments passed bills that all but prohibited any further technological advances in order to stop anything like PeaceMaker from happening again. A massive black market for technology sprung up in its wake to fulfil people’s needs, while others turned to religious fanaticism in the form of The Church of Natural Humans, which spoke out against “the Technos, saying that their work was the work of the Devil… and the Anti-Christ is of course the man behind PeaceMaker.
Who, you know, just happens to be the father of the protagonist, David Brown. His father was a brilliant programmer and David has inherited his skills, but even though he tests as a genius, his grades are only mediocre. He can’t settle down with the fact that his father was the man behind something like PeaceMaker, so he decides to find out what really happened ten years ago. The novel proceeds to follow David as he unwinds the mysteries from the past while he gets further and further entangled in a war between two powerful and opposing fractions that are headed straight for each others throats…
“Unholy Domain” is a quick read, clocking in at a respectable 352 pages of fast paced content, and while it doesn’t come close to anything written by Philip K. Dick either thematically or stylistically, it does in the end approach what I’d call a trademark thriller. There’s a lot of well-written action, there are mysteries (who aren’t all that mysterious but the book likes to pretend that they are) and there’s a nice and familiar romance angle that winds down just the way the doctor ordered. Ronco tries with variable success to portray a believable future where technology clashes with the values of a religious mind, which makes for interesting subject material, but I’d say that it was rather poorly executed from a narrative viewpoint. Not only does the author reveal the future of the world via made-up book quotes that head the chapters, rendering the thriller concept nearly impotent from the get-go, but his characterization felt deeply flawed to me. David Brown never managed to become something more than the plot device that he was, and the fanatics on both sides were so fanatic that they seemed alien to me as a reader, thus destroying any chance for me to become as fully immersed in Ronco’s world as I’d like to be.
Another thing that bothered me enough to mention here was the unnecessary, and quite frankly, tasteless comments about sex that all but a couple of PoV’s came with during the novel, and perhaps the worst scene in the whole book came when two unknown characters appeared out of nowhere to, in effect, just rape two female characters, one of which had the classy nickname, “DoubleD”… I can get that some unclassy schmucks could nickname a woman something like “DoubleD” behind her back, but having a woman refer to herself by her cup-size seemed very jarring to me, especially since the woman in question was far from helpless. Ah, well…
All in all I wouldn’t recommend “Unholy Domain”. It’s far from unreadable, it’s just that it’s not very well written and it doesn’t cover its assigned area with enough gusto to become anything close to a “must read”, even if the author appears very knowledgeable in the particular area. However, I don’t regret reading it, because I had a good time reading the entertaining action scenes, and even though I knew what was happening, I thought the last hundred pages marked a step up in quality from the jumbled start.
4.0 /10
Want a second opinion? Check out what Realms of Speculative Fiction had to say about “Unholy Domain”. They do make a good point with the Dan Brown comparison.

Posts
First, I wanted to say great review - and I really mean it; second, I wanted to direct you to Trin’s review of Unholy Domain, but then I saw you linked to it in the end, so thanks Amras.
23. July 2008 @ 05:12 ( Permalink )
Thanks! I was sad that I had to give this one a poor review because I really wanted to like it given the circumstances, but I had to be honest with myself. There’s no use in a review if you butter it up.
23. July 2008 @ 12:28 ( Permalink )
Poor… any writer would probably be unhappy with a score of 4/10, naturally, but really, 4/10 isn’t poor, it’s on the somewhat boring side of mediocre. If you thought it truly was poor, the score should be something like 3 and down. Or?
23. July 2008 @ 12:36 ( Permalink )
No, not poor in that sense, but compared to most of my book reviews it’s downright catastrophic. I can’t even remember the last time I gave a book a 4/10 or less.
23. July 2008 @ 12:44 ( Permalink )
That’s because you like everyone else are unlikely to pick up, read, finish and review a book that’s outright poor in the true sense of the word. You know your own tastes, you know enough people, authors and reviewers with relatively corresponding tastes and you know the genres you read well enough to not waste your time with things you’ll hate outright. It stands to reason, thus, that when a book is thrust upon you from the outside, no matter how pleasant the circumstances, it’s got a much greater danger of getting a truly lousy grade than one you’d pick yourself without any outside pulling or pushing. That taken into account, 4/10 isn’t that bad a grade for this book if you ask me.
23. July 2008 @ 17:27 ( Permalink )
So true I’m not even going to mention that you recounted things I’m already very aware of.
Oh wait… never mind
24. July 2008 @ 07:07 ( Permalink )
I just pointed out that they’re facts that all contribute to nuance your statement rather heavily, and that you’re aware of them is hardly a defense for ignoring them in your statements - quite the opposite, as it happens.
24. July 2008 @ 08:31 ( Permalink )
I didn’t ignore them; I chose to not mention them because I found them to be quite obvious (there was originally a long-winded paragraph about the very facts you point out, but it didn’t contribute much to the whole).
24. July 2008 @ 12:01 ( Permalink )
I’m not talking about the review, I’m talking about the comment in which you stated that your view of the review as one judging the book as “poor” was due to contextualisation with your reviews in general, a statement only factually true if these very important remedying factors are ignored. My point, then, is (and has always been) that you were either compromising the truth purposefully, bending sheer irrelevant statistics into qualitative remarks, or that you were ignorant of these facts. I found the former to be more likely and wanted to correct you. Of course, if the latter would turn out to have been true, my comment would still have been productively educating for you.
High horse, sir? I’ll have you know it’s a unicorn, and it’s not just high it’s fucking stoned.
24. July 2008 @ 12:07 ( Permalink )
Did it perhaps neigh Jehova? *ducks*
24. July 2008 @ 12:23 ( Permalink )
I wouldn’t know, I don’t speak unicorn. I suppose it’s a possibility.
24. July 2008 @ 12:48 ( Permalink )
(Elegant attempt at replying without admitting I was right, by the way)
24. July 2008 @ 12:49 ( Permalink )
Elegant as a swan doing the fox-trot am I. That’s what the man in the mirror keeps tellin’ me.
24. July 2008 @ 13:41 ( Permalink )
The man in the mirror then either has an overly optimistic view of swans’ dancing capabilities, or he’s spot-on.
24. July 2008 @ 15:55 ( Permalink )